ERRR #028. Viviane Robinson on Reducing Change to Increase Improvement
Apr 1, 2019
auto_awesome
Viviane Robinson, an expert in education and leadership, discusses her book on reducing change to increase improvement. The podcast explores her engagement approach to effective school improvement and the principles and frameworks needed for leading improvement. They also discuss the importance of effective communication, finding a balance between social interaction and class time, and the impact of systems and structures on engagement in education.
Clearly defining evaluative criteria is crucial when evaluating different theories of action.
Leaders should openly share their evaluations while maintaining respect and considering different perspectives for true engagement.
Examining the flaws and consequences of the current theory of action is essential in creating a more effective alternative theory.
Deep dives
The Importance of Defining Evaluative Criteria
When evaluating the relative merit of current and alternative theories of action, it is crucial to define the evaluative criteria. This involves identifying the important outcomes and criteria that need to be met for a theory to be considered effective and worthwhile. By clearly defining the criteria, both parties can have a shared understanding of what needs to be achieved and can more effectively evaluate the theories of action being discussed.
Withholding or Sharing Evaluations
In discussions and evaluations, it is common for leaders to withhold their own evaluations and instead ask the other person to disclose theirs in the hope that they align. However, this strategy does not lead to true engagement, as both parties need access to each other's thinking. Leaders should work towards openly sharing their evaluations, while still maintaining respect and a willingness to consider different perspectives. This involves reframing thinking to be more open to the possibility of being wrong and being willing to have respectful and honest conversations.
Creating an Alternative Theory of Action
To create an alternative theory of action, it is important to examine the current theory's flaws and the consequences it produces. By revealing and critiquing the current theory, individuals can recognize the negative effects it may have on their well-being or effectiveness. Having a clear understanding of the current theory allows for the development of new beliefs and actions that can lead to more positive outcomes. Collaborative discussions, access to comparative data, and a focus on desired outcomes can assist in crafting a more effective and beneficial theory of action.
Focus on understanding the present before designing the future
The key to improvement is to thoroughly study and understand the present situation before attempting to design solutions for the future. This involves deeply understanding the theory of action driving current practices and exploring the beliefs, actions, and consequences at play.
Engagement approach versus bypass approach
There are two approaches to problem-solving: engagement and bypass. The engagement approach involves deeply understanding current practices and beliefs, engaging in open and honest dialogue, and actively involving all stakeholders in the process of uncovering solutions. The bypass approach, on the other hand, focuses on quick fixes and superficial solutions without thoroughly understanding the underlying causes. The engagement approach is more effective for sustainable improvement.
Importance of relationships and skilled facilitation
Strong relationships and skilled facilitation are key components of the engagement approach. Building trust and creating safe spaces for open dialogue are critical in order to uncover the deep-rooted beliefs, actions, and consequences that impact current practices. Skilled facilitators can navigate complex conversations and guide the process of revealing theories of action and designing alternative solutions. Relationships are not just foundational but integral in the process of improvement.