Jonathan Luff, a former British diplomat, shares his experiences leading the UK’s bid for the 2018 World Cup. He sheds light on the complexities and challenges of the bidding process, including ethical dilemmas and the opaque FIFA voting methods. Luff discusses British soft power, the nation’s economic stagnation, and contrasts UK and US diplomatic approaches. He reflects on the impact of past policies, questioning whether previous strategies were misguided and emphasizing the importance of integrity in international sports diplomacy.
The World Cup bidding process highlights the critical role of diplomacy and support from government and football organizations in gaining credibility.
Despite the disappointment of losing the bid, maintaining integrity and transparency throughout the campaign process was emphasized as paramount over achieving victory.
Deep dives
Involvement in the 2018 World Cup Bid
The individual recounts their journey that led to their involvement in the 2018 World Cup bid, beginning with over a decade of experience in the Foreign Office. Initially stationed overseas in the Middle East and later in Paris, the opportunity arose when a friend from the Foreign Office, who was the Prime Minister's private secretary for Foreign Affairs, invited them to lunch to discuss a last-minute project. This project was critical, focusing on the final six weeks of the World Cup bid as the Prime Minister had made it a personal priority. The informal nature of this invitation highlights how occasionally the civil service can adapt to urgent needs outside the standard bureaucratic processes.
Structure and Requirements of World Cup Bidding
The World Cup bidding process is outlined as involving a formal submission of candidacy, with participants including representatives from various football organizations, government, and media professionals. The government's role is supportive, providing credibility to the bid, as there are financial implications such as infrastructure and security. Efforts during the English bid also included learning from past mistakes, ensuring the presentation was humble and focused on winning the bid’s merit rather than entitlement. Strong backing from the government and top football clubs bolstered the English bid's credibility and message, although it was ultimately unsuccessful.
Navigating the Competitive Bidding Landscape
During the final stages of the bidding process, the individual emphasized the importance of diplomacy and understanding the strengths and weaknesses in garnering support from the FIFA Executive Committee. The unique situation of having simultaneous bids for both the 2018 and 2022 World Cups complicated the dynamics, as nations were expected to rally support for their bids amidst perceived vote trading. The role involved creating opportunities for the Prime Minister to personally meet with key decision-makers, as having public figures express support was crucial. Despite these efforts, the England bid received minimal votes, with only two supporting their candidacy in a system marred by allegations of corrupt practices.
Reflections on Integrity and Foreign Policy
Reflecting on the bidding experience, the individual expressed disappointment over the loss but noted the importance of maintaining integrity throughout the process, contrasting their approach with the alleged corruption among some FIFA committee members. The commitment to campaigning with transparency and honorable means was highlighted, even when outcomes did not favor them. They also drew parallels between this event and broader themes in British foreign policy, emphasizing the significance of acting with integrity in a world where standards often shift. Ultimately, the experience instilled a belief that adhering to ethical campaign practices is more commendable than achieving victory through questionable means.
Today’s interviewee, Jonathan Luff, was a British diplomat for more than a decade, and worked on the British bid for the 2018 World Cup in the Prime Minister’s office.
Timestamps:
[00:00] Introduction
[00:21] How do you bid for the World Cup?
[11:37] Was the UK too naive to win a bid?
[20:52] Does British soft power still matter?
[23:51] What are the bottlenecks to British economic growth?
[31:37] Can Britain do strategic deterrence with limited resources?
[36:25] How do British diplomats and American diplomats differ?
[48:10] Was Cameron’s foreign policy all a mistake?
This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.statecraft.pub
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode