Does human behaviour render all economic models useless?
Oct 4, 2023
auto_awesome
Economists question the predictability of human behavior in economic models. They explore the concept of rational and irrational behaviors and the influence of greed and optimism. The podcast also discusses the limitations of a cooperative framework and the importance of balancing selfishness with altruism through government intervention. Additionally, it explores the impact of financial instruments on the economy, the significance of consumer confidence, and the need for a weather system-like model to evaluate public policies.
Economists' assumption of uniform human behavior may render economic models useless.
Predicting behavior for different segments of society could complicate economic models and make them ineffective.
Deep dives
Greed as a Driving Force in Human Behavior
The podcast explores the notion of greed and its role in determining human behavior. It challenges the idea that humans are always driven by rational self-interest, as suggested by economists like Milton Friedman. It argues that the complexities of human emotions and irrationality cannot be overlooked in economic models.
The Limitations of Rational Decision-Making
The podcast questions the assumption that economic models are based on the notion that individuals always act as rational actors. It highlights the existence of irrational behavior, which renders some economic models useless. It emphasizes the importance of considering behavioral nuances and the unpredictability of human decision-making.
The Importance of Structured Relationships within the Economy
The podcast discusses the significance of structural relationships in economic modeling. It suggests that a focus on the behavior of individuals alone is insufficient; it is crucial to account for the structure of the economic system. By incorporating various segments and interactions, a more realistic model can be built that better reflects real-world dynamics.
The Interplay of Altruism and Selfishness
The podcast explores the coexistence of altruistic and selfish behavior in economic decision-making. It highlights how individuals may individually prioritize self-interest but rely on government systems and societal frameworks to pursue altruistic goals. The importance of balancing both elements within economic models is emphasized.
Economists like to believe human behaviour is predictable. Otherwise, they probably wouldn’t have a job. Steve Keen argue that we do tend to behave like the rest of the herd, but how many herds are there? Phil asks if economists need to develop the sort of demographic segmentation modellers that marketers use? It’s certainly a long way from the basic assumption that we all act the same – as one representative agent, driven by fear and greed. But if we develop a more sophisticated approach, predicting behaviour for a number of segments of society, wouldn’t we arrive at a model so complicated, so full of assumptions, that it renders the model useless? In other words, can we ever really understand the psychology of human behaviour?