
The Thomistic Institute Rebutting Necessitarian Universalism: Three Thomistic Arguments – Prof. Mats Wahlberg
Dec 19, 2025
In this engaging discussion, Dr. Mats Wahlberg, a systematic theology expert and former Aquinas Chair, challenges the idea of necessitarian universalism, arguing it clashes with key Christian beliefs. He presents three compelling Thomistic arguments for the possibility of eternal damnation, emphasizing God's respect for human nature and the significance of true free will. Wahlberg clarifies misconceptions about hell, framing it as self-exclusion from divine love rather than arbitrary punishment, and delves into the interplay between goodness, freedom, and the nature of divine causality.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Hell As Self-Exclusion, Not Torture
- The Catholic doctrine of hell is a permanent, self-inflicted separation from God rather than arbitrary torture.
- Hell's chief punishment is the pain of loss, with sensory images as secondary metaphors reflecting spiritual misery.
Divine Governance Respects Creaturely Natures
- God governs creatures in a way that conforms to their natures, permitting natural potencies to be actualized.
- Because rational creatures are naturally fallible, God may fittingly allow moral failure without undermining freedom.
The 'Imaginary God' Who Can't Permit Death
- Wahlberg uses an 'Imaginary God' thought experiment who cannot permit death to show internal tension.
- That fantasy God's inability to permit a natural potency would force mutilation of created nature.
