On Theme: Design Systems in Depth The flaws of the “accessibility is built in to the design system” argument, with Daniel Henderson-Ede — #12
14 snips
Apr 7, 2025 Daniel Henderson-Ede, Head of Design Technology and Systems at Mantis& Co., shares valuable insights on accessibility in design. He challenges the flawed belief that design systems automatically ensure accessibility, emphasizing ongoing effort and individual responsibility. The discussion explores the need for empathy in design, the limitations of relying solely on accessibility experts, and the integration of accessibility guidance in design documentation. Daniel advocates for hands-on experience to enhance user understanding, especially for individuals with disabilities.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Accessibility as a Spectrum
- "Built-in accessibility" implies accessibility is binary (fully present or absent), but it's a spectrum.
- This phrasing misrepresents design systems and creates unrealistic expectations.
Misplaced Blame
- Daniel Henderson-Ede observed that teams blame design systems for accessibility issues they themselves caused.
- This misunderstanding arises from overselling the design system's capabilities, leading to disappointment.
Automated Accessibility
- Developers sometimes mistakenly assume design systems automatically handle all accessibility aspects, like image alt text.
- Daniel Henderson-Ede points out how this expectation can lead to confusion and misplaced blame.