On Theme: Design Systems in Depth
The flaws of the “accessibility is built in to the design system” argument, with Daniel Henderson-Ede — #12
Apr 7, 2025
Daniel Henderson-Ede, Head of Design Technology and Systems at Mantis& Co., shares valuable insights on accessibility in design. He challenges the flawed belief that design systems automatically ensure accessibility, emphasizing ongoing effort and individual responsibility. The discussion explores the need for empathy in design, the limitations of relying solely on accessibility experts, and the integration of accessibility guidance in design documentation. Daniel advocates for hands-on experience to enhance user understanding, especially for individuals with disabilities.
38:40
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The misconception that design systems ensure built-in accessibility leads to negligence in addressing actual accessibility issues by teams.
- Successful accessibility implementation relies on ongoing collaboration and understanding among design, engineering, and product management teams, rather than solely on design systems.
Deep dives
The Illusion of Built-in Accessibility
The term 'built-in accessibility' is commonly used to promote design systems, but it creates misconceptions about the level of accessibility that can be achieved. Many professionals believe that adopting a design system automatically ensures a fully accessible product, leading to neglect in addressing accessibility issues. The reality is that accessibility exists on a spectrum and cannot be reduced to a binary state of being either accessible or not. This overselling can foster a culture where teams blame the design system for accessibility failures rather than recognizing their own responsibilities.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
