Listener Mailbag: Starve the Beast, Property Tax, and NDIS & Productivity Debates

Jul 4, 2025

51:20

forum

Ask episode

view_agenda

Chapters

auto_awesome

Transcript

info_circle

Episode notes

Show host Gene Tunny delves into listener feedback on recent episodes regarding the feasibility of tax cuts preceding spending cuts ("starve the beast"), a capital gains tax on property, and the practicality of Georgist land taxes. He explores the complexities behind Australia's productivity challenges and regulatory capture issues raised by listeners.

Please email Gene your thoughts on this episode via contact@economicsexplored.com.

Timestamps

Feedback from Listeners and Show Updates (0:00)
Discussion on the Starve the Beast Theory (2:26)
Listener Feedback from Australia (8:25)
Georgism and Property Taxation (20:11)
Feedback on Productivity and Regulatory Capture (26:25)
NDIS and Labour Force Participation (30:16)
Tax Reform and Efficiency (41:15)
Closing Remarks and Future Plans (50:21)

Takeaways

Tax Cuts Need Matching Spending Cuts: The "starve the beast" theory—that tax cuts alone will force spending cuts—is usually ineffective, historically resulting in higher deficits and debt.
Capital Gains Tax Controversy: Taxing capital gains on family homes would be politically unpopular and controversial.
Productivity and NDIS Debate: Growth in social services sectors, such as Australia’s National Disability Insurance Scheme, may negatively impact productivity measures, although this growth may also bring social benefits.
Avoid Regulatory Capture: Effective regulatory reform requires vigilance against corporate lobbying and vested interests to ensure regulations genuinely benefit the public.