Troubleshooting Agile

Systems Thinking Rant Redux Part I

18 snips
Oct 15, 2025
The hosts dive deep into the contentious debate surrounding systems thinking. They recap their strong reactions to Ed Braden's article and highlight varied listener responses, from agreement to skepticism. Key discussions include the importance of precise language and mutual understanding in this context. Jeffrey shares his motivation for engaging with Ed's critique, while emphasizing the need for evidence-based conversations. They tease a forthcoming rebuttal to Ed’s claims, keeping the audience eager for more insights.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Why The Debate Began

  • Ed Bradon's article critiqued systems thinking as a source of many government ills and suggested people overreach in controlling systems.
  • Douglas Squirrel and Jeffrey Fredrick felt compelled to respond because they value systems thinking and saw flaws in that critique.
ANECDOTE

The Original Heated Response

  • Jeffrey expressed a strong, uncompromising disagreement with Ed's conclusions during the previous episode.
  • Douglas recalls the episode as heated and notes it generated substantial discussion online.
INSIGHT

Engage To Update Your Map

  • Jeffrey treats this as an intellectual conversation and wanted to take Ed's arguments seriously to update his views.
  • He values participation in a reality-based discourse and wanted to learn, not just win an argument.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app