The Political Orphanage
Deporting Khalil
Mar 21, 2025
Anna Gorisch, an immigration attorney from Kendall Immigration Law, dives into the case of Mahmoud Khalil, who faces deportation due to his association with Hamas. The conversation navigates the complex interplay of immigration law, national security, and free speech rights. They discuss the challenging balance between advocacy and national interest, along with the impact of executive power on deportation policies. The episode also touches on the importance of due process within the immigration system and ends on a lighter note with anecdotes about Austin.
47:59
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The case of Mahmoud Khalil highlights the contentious relationship between protected speech and incitement within the context of national security.
- The podcast emphasizes the importance of due process for permanent residents in immigration proceedings, raising concerns about executive discretion and fairness.
Deep dives
The Case of Mahmoud Khalil
Mahmoud Khalil, a permanent resident of the U.S., was detained by ICE following accusations of engaging in pro-Hamas activities at Columbia University. The discussion revolves around whether his actions constitute protected speech under the First Amendment or incitement that falls outside of those protections. While the Trump administration defends the legality of his deportation under immigration laws that permit removal for threatening national security interests, doubts linger about the clarity of the evidence supporting these claims. The nuances of his legal status as a conditional permanent resident and the implications for his constitutional rights are central to the analysis of his case.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
