In this podcast, the history of Mobil Oil's advertorial marketing and its impact on U.S. history is explored. The unconventional methods used to improve the company's public image during an oil crisis are highlighted, along with Herb Schmert's advice on PR tactics. The podcast also discusses online privacy, puzzles for mental well-being, the First Amendment rights of corporations, and the impact of the Citizens United case on campaign finance.
34:55
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Oil companies use initiatives unrelated to their core business to shape public perception and establish a moral and ethical image.
Mobile Oil's campaign for corporate personhood contributed to the development of corporate free speech rights in the US, allowing corporations to influence public opinion and policy debates.
Deep dives
Oil companies' philanthropic marketing strategies
Oil companies spend money on activities unrelated to their core business, such as sponsoring sports events, funding education initiatives, or supporting women in STEM. They use these initiatives to shape public perception, present a moral and ethical image, and establish a reputation and personality as corporations.
Herb Schmerz's role in corporate philanthropy
Herb Schmerz, a former VP of Public Affairs for Mobile Oil, popularized the concept of issue advertising or affinity of purpose marketing. He believed corporations should focus on ideas and issues, becoming more than just sellers of their products. Mobile Oil sponsored art exhibitions, literary prizes, published opinion pieces, and even sponsored Masterpiece Theater, all of which helped humanize the company and shape its reputation.
Mobil's influence on corporate free speech
Mobile Oil's campaign for corporate personhood played a significant role in the development of corporate free speech rights in the United States. Their efforts, along with the First National Bank of Boston versus Boulotti case, set a precedent for allowing corporations to use their financial resources to amplify their influence in the public space, shaping public discourse and influencing public opinion.
The impact of Citizens United on corporate free speech
The Supreme Court case Citizens United versus the Federal Election Committee further solidified corporate free speech rights, allowing corporations and labor unions to spend unlimited amounts of money to sway public opinion during election campaigns. The ruling, combined with the earlier cases, gave corporations the ability to use their large budgets and influence to systematically shape public opinion and policy discussions.
In the 1970s, Mobil Oil had invented the advertorial and was aggressively pursuing an entirely new type of marketing, branding the company as a person with a unique personality and opinions that deserved to be heard. When public backlash threatened to undermine their approach, they launched a campaign that would change the course of U.S. history. Transcript