Shameless Popery
#146 “Peter Never Went to Rome” and other Protestant fictions… - Joe Heschmeyer
Feb 18, 2025
The discussion dives deep into the claim that St. Peter never visited Rome, challenging this notion with compelling biblical and historical evidence. It highlights his pivotal role in leading the church there. Listeners will discover fascinating archaeological findings, including significant relics under St. Peter's Basilica, that reinforce his connection to the city. The episode also confronts Protestant skepticism about papal authority, shedding light on the importance of the papacy in Christianity.
00:00
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The podcast argues that biblical references to 'Babylon' in 1 Peter suggest St. Peter's actual presence in Rome.
- Historical and archaeological evidence, including early Christian writings and findings beneath St. Peter's Basilica, support Peter's Rome connection.
Deep dives
Biblical Evidence of Peter's Presence in Rome
The claim that St. Peter never went to Rome is countered by several pieces of biblical evidence, particularly emphasizing his reference to 'Babylon' in 1 Peter. Historically, many Jewish writers under Roman occupation used Babylon as a veiled reference to Rome. The context of Revelation, which also refers to Babylon in relation to a city built on seven hills and noted for martyring Christians, further supports this interpretation, clearly indicating that the scripture implies Rome rather than the ancient city of Babylon. Thus, St. Peter’s mention of Babylon can be interpreted as an acknowledgment of his location in Rome, particularly given his association with St. Mark there.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
