SBF Trial, Day 11: How Alameda Got FTX Into a $9 Billion Hole
Oct 19, 2023
auto_awesome
Accounting professor Peter Easton, known for his work on high-profile cases like Enron and Worldcom, presents a detailed analysis revealing that Alameda had used customer funds for VC investments, real estate, and donations. The defense challenges Easton's accounting methods. Other witnesses' relevance is questioned by the judge, criticizing the prosecution for wasting time.
FTX mismanaged customer funds by using them for investments, political donations, real estate purchases, and loan repayments.
The co-mingling of funds between FTX and Alameda contradicts earlier claims that they were separate entities.
Deep dives
FTX Mismanagement of Customer Funds
The podcast episode discusses the testimony of Notre Dame accounting professor Peter Easton, hired by the US Justice Department to analyze FTX and Alameda balance sheets, who revealed that FTX mismanaged customer funds. Easton's analysis showed that FTX used customer assets for its own purposes, with investments, political donations, real estate purchases, and loan repayments all made using customer money. The amount owed to customers on FTX was significantly greater than what FTX actually held in its crypto wallets. The co-mingling of funds between FTX and Alameda was also highlighted, contradicting earlier claims that they were separate entities.
Inconclusive Testimonies and Twitter Activity
The podcast episode also mentions the testimonies of witnesses that were deemed irrelevant by the judge and highlights Twitter activity by Bankman Freed that suggested indifference to FTX's financial situation. Testimony from Eliora Katz, a Washington DC lobbyist, and Corey Gaddis, a Google records custodian, was criticized for lack of relevance. Bankman Freed's tweets and private messages, including conversations with crypto influencers and journalists, suggested different messages for different audiences and an attempt to manipulate perceptions. Judge Kaplan expressed frustration over the inclusion of witnesses who did not contribute to the overall case.
The courtroom was abuzz on Wednesday as financial and technical experts took the stand in the ongoing criminal trial against Sam Bankman-Fried. Accounting professor Peter Easton, a standout witness, presented a detailed analysis showing that Alameda had spent customer funds on VC investments, real estate, and political and charitable donations. Easton, who had previously worked on high-profile cases like Enron and Worldcom, said that by the end, the gap between what FTX owed to customers and what it had on hand was $8.8 billion.
The defense, led by attorney David Lisner, attempted to challenge Easton's methods. Lisner questioned the accounting of the fiat@ftx internal account, which tracks customer deposits. Easton admitted to lumping amounts owed to customers from FTX’s bank accounts with what was owed to customers from Alameda's bank accounts, giving the defense an opportunity to question his accuracy.
The day also saw other witnesses, including a former FTX lobbyist and a Google employee, both of whose relevance was questioned by Judge Kaplan. The judge criticized the prosecution for wasting time with witnesses who seemed to offer little to the case.