Unchained

New Order in SEC vs. Ripple Over XRP Is a Win for Crypto: What Happens Now? - Ep. 518

Jul 14, 2023
Lewis Cohen, co-founder of DLx Law and a legal expert in cryptocurrency, breaks down the landmark ruling in the SEC vs. Ripple case. He discusses why XRP was deemed not a security for some buyers, a decision that may reshape crypto regulations. Lewis highlights the significance of distinguishing between programmatic and institutional sales, and how this ruling could influence future offerings across the industry. He also speculates on potential appeals and their implications for major exchanges like Coinbase.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Two Types of Sales

  • Judge Analisa Torres's order split the Ripple case into institutional sales and programmatic sales.
  • Institutional sales were deemed securities, while programmatic sales were not.
INSIGHT

Howey Test Application

  • Institutional sales met the Howey Test's four prongs due to direct investment, common enterprise, profit expectation, and dependence on Ripple Labs.
  • Programmatic sales, however, resembled secondary market transactions where buyers didn't directly invest in Ripple.
INSIGHT

Rejection of Morphing Concept

  • Judge Torres rejected the "morphing concept" where a token starts as a security and later changes.
  • She emphasized that a token isn't inherently a security but depends on the transaction's circumstances.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app