Barbara Bradley Hagerty, a former NPR correspondent and author known for her investigative work on law and justice, dives into the wrongful conviction of Ben Spencer, who was sentenced to life despite lacking evidence. She unpacks the flawed system that allowed his case to persist for over three decades. The discussion reveals unsettling truths about the impact of race, socioeconomic disparities, and the inadequacies of eyewitness testimony. The podcast also highlights the arduous journey and unwavering hope of both Spencer and those fighting for his justice.
Ben Spencer's wrongful conviction underscores significant flaws in the criminal justice system, particularly regarding flawed witness testimony and racial bias.
Barbara Bradley Hagerty's investigation reveals the critical role of advocacy and reinvestigation in addressing miscarriages of justice for the wrongly convicted.
Deep dives
The Haunting Case of Ben Spencer
Barbara Bradley Haggerty details the compelling story of Ben Spencer, a Black man wrongfully convicted of murder in 1987. Spencer was accused of killing Jeffrey Young, a white executive, in Dallas, amidst rising racial tensions and societal pressures. His case relied heavily on witness testimonies from individuals seeking a reward, alongside a jailhouse informant whose motives were questionable. Despite the lack of physical evidence linking Spencer to the crime, he was convicted, showcasing deep flaws in the criminal justice system.
Witness Credibility in Question
The integrity of the witnesses against Ben Spencer came under scrutiny as Barbara uncovered crucial evidence of misconduct during the trial. The key witness, Gladys Oliver, was found to have received payments for her testimony, a detail that could have significantly undermined her credibility. This relationship with Crime Stoppers raised questions about the reliability of witnesses incentivized by monetary rewards, a common thread in wrongful convictions. This pattern of incentivized testimonies highlights systemic issues within the justice system that often place pressure on witnesses to provide incriminating statements.
The Long Road to Redemption
After enduring years in prison, Ben Spencer’s fight for justice attracted the attention of Jim McCloskey from Centurion Ministries, a nonprofit focused on investigating wrongful convictions. Despite living in dire conditions and losing hope, Spencer’s resilience kept him engaged in advocating for his innocence. His written correspondence with McCloskey led to a reinvestigation of his case, providing a glimmer of hope. This underscores the importance of advocacy efforts and the tireless work of individuals committed to addressing the flaws in the justice system.
In 1987, Ben Spencer, a young black man from Dallas, Texas was convicted in the killing of a white businessman. He was sentenced to life in prison by an all-white jury. There was no physical evidence linking him to the crime and he had an alibi. Over the years, eyewitnesses recanted their testimony and a judge, after reviewing all the prior evidence, declared Spencer to be an innocent man. Nonetheless, Spencer remained in prison for more than three decades. For seven of those years, former NPR correspondent Barbara Bradley Hagerty follows and followed the twists and turns of this case. Her dissection of wrongful convictions and the criminal justice system is at the heart of her new book, Bringing Ben Home: A Murder, A Conviction And The Fight to Redeem American Justice.
Today on The Sunday Story from Up First, part one of a two-part series looking at why it is so hard to get a conviction overturned even when evidence of innocence is overwhelming. Part two is also available now on the Up First podcast feed.