How does Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act weaken the RTI?
Apr 3, 2025
auto_awesome
Anjali Bhardwaj, a leading advocate for citizens' right to information, discusses how Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act threatens the Right to Information Act in India. She outlines the tension between privacy and transparency, explaining how the new regulations could erode public accountability. Bhardwaj highlights potential consequences for journalists facing penalties for accessing essential information and warns how marginalized communities might suffer from reduced access to governance data. The conversation emphasizes the urgent need for public discourse surrounding these changes.
Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act undermines the RTI Act by broadly defining personal information, restricting citizens' access to vital public data.
The new obligations imposed on journalists as data fiduciaries may severely hinder investigative journalism, threatening both free speech and accountability.
Deep dives
Impact of Section 44.3 on the Right to Information Act
The introduction of Section 44.3 of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act poses a significant threat to the Right to Information (RTI) Act, which was established to promote government accountability and transparency. This provision eliminates the nuanced exemptions previously defined in Section 8.1 of the RTI Act, which balanced the public's right to information with individual privacy rights. Activists emphasize that this amendment effectively prohibits citizens from accessing any information deemed personal, thereby stifling transparency, particularly in areas crucial for public accountability like loan write-offs and government contracts. As a result, vital information that was historically accessible through RTI requests will likely become completely restricted, depriving citizens of an essential tool for holding authorities accountable.
Broad Definition of Personal Information
Under the Data Protection Act, personal information is broadly defined to encompass any detail that identifies an individual, leading to significant implications for public access to information. This includes not just names but also addresses and other identifiable details, which can now be used as grounds to deny information requests. Consequently, crucial data, such as the identities of beneficiaries in various government schemes or individuals involved in large loan transactions, may no longer be publicly available. The expanded definition of personal information severely limits citizens' ability to scrutinize government activities, undermining the foundational principle of transparency that RTI aimed to uphold.
Removal of Legislative Access Clauses
The removal of provisions allowing citizens to access information that could not be denied to Parliament or state legislatures is set to create further barriers to accountability. Previously, citizens could argue for access to information on the basis that similar data would be provided to elected representatives. This critical clause has now been omitted under the new law, which means citizens will not be able to obtain essential data about government spending, public distribution systems, and even electoral roll details if they contain personal identification. Such a change not only isolates citizens from the legislative process but also reinforces the government's control over public information, weakening democratic accountability.
Implications for Journalistic Freedom
The enactment of the Data Protection Act also imposes onerous obligations on journalists by classifying them as data fiduciaries, requiring them to obtain consent before collecting or processing personal data. This requirement is likely to hinder investigative journalism, as many crucial stories depend on accessing public information and processing it for public interest. The potential for massive fines—up to 500 crores—for non-compliance adds a layer of intimidation, effectively silencing dissenting voices who seek to challenge corruption and wrongdoing. By creating an environment where the government can control both the flow and processing of information, this law poses a serious threat to the fundamental tenets of free speech and press freedom in a democracy.
The Right to Information Act was a historic piece of legislation that gave ordinary citizens a legally enforceable means to seek information about the government’s functioning – a small step towards accountability.
But over the years, governments have progressively diluted the provisions of this law. The latest blow to the RTI is in the form of Section 44 (3) of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023. This law will come into force once the Rules under it are notified, which is expected to happen this month. law’s Rules are notified, and that is expected to happen any time now.
How does Section 44 (3) of the DPDP Act weaken the Right to Information Act? Why is the Opposition demanding that it be repealed? And what are the consequences for citizens if this Section stays?
Guest: Anjali Bhardwaj, founder of the Satark Nagarik Sangathan and co-convenor of the National Campaign for the People’s Right to Information (NCPRI).
Host: G. Sampath, Social Affairs Editor, The Hindu
Edited by Shiva Raj
Recorded and Produced by Jude Francis Weston
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode