
The Protestant Libertarian Podcast Ep 237: The Antichrists
4 snips
Dec 30, 2025 The discussion dives into the concept of 'antichrists' as defined in 1 and 2 John, arguing they represent a type of person rather than a singular figure. It explores the implications of denying Jesus' messianic identity and incarnation, warning against modern interpretations that echo this denial. The host critiques the cultural impact of the Left Behind series, connects Jesus' kingship to libertarian ideals, and emphasizes the dangers of political idolatry among Christians. Overall, it's a thought-provoking examination of faith and politics.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Early Reading Led To A Different Antichrist View
- Alex Bernardo recounts reading the Gospels at 14, which led him to reject Left Behind-style antichrist ideas.
- That early study convinced him the Antichrist isn't a single future figure but a present type.
Denying Messiahship Equals Exclusion
- Bernardo highlights John's core definition: antichrists deny Jesus is the Christ (Messiah).
- Denying Jesus as Messiah excludes one from having the Father and the church community.
Incarnation Denial Is Central To Antichrist Typology
- John adds a second defining trait: antichrists deny Jesus came in the flesh.
- This combats proto-docetic views that Jesus was only a spirit or appearance.



