The podcast explores Focus Financial's unique loan deal that allowed them to fund an acquisition without refinancing existing debt, discussing the implications of the wording of the credit agreement. They also delve into CD&R's strategy of majority equity ownership without board control, the complexities in sponsor and board dynamics, potential legal action for lenders due to change of control, and the maneuver's implications for future situations.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Focus Financial avoided triggering a change of control in its debt by leaving existing term loans untouched while raising funds for a buyout through an incremental loan.
The loan deal structure raises concerns about the board's decision-making power and the potential for similar situations in the future with other companies.
Deep dives
Loan deal structure without triggering change of control
Focus Financial, a conglomerate of wealth management firms, recently underwent a change in ownership without triggering a change of control in its debt. Typically, when a company gets a new majority owner, the company needs to refinance its debt. However, Focus Financial avoided this by leaving its existing term loans untouched, totaling $2.5 billion, and raising funds for the $7 billion LBO through a $500 million incremental loan. This was achieved by splitting the economics from the voting power, allowing the new majority owner to avoid triggering the change of control clause.
Implications of not having board control
While the new majority equity owner, Clayton de Bélion Rice, does not control the board of Focus Financial, this raises questions about critical decisions such as declaring dividends, approving mergers, issuing additional equity, choosing the CEO, and more. If the board lacks control, it is worth considering the power dynamics and whether shareholder agreements grant veto power over major transactions. It is unclear if the board, ultimately answerable to both sponsors, can function effectively in this arrangement.
Potential legal implications and lender response
The loan deal structure raises red flags, given its divergence from the usual change of control provisions. Lenders might have grounds for legal action if they were not given the opportunity to redeem due to the change in ownership. However, currently, lenders are hesitant to sue as the existing loans are trading close to par value. While the maneuver may not have significant negative consequences for investors in this case, it highlights the potential for similar situations in the future with other companies that use comparable language in their agreements.
When is a change in control not a change of control? That is the question some Focus Financial lenders are asking after the company managed to finance its $7bn buyout without refinancing its existing debt.
It all hinges on the wording of the credit agreement — so for this week’s episode of Cloud 9fin, Will Caiger-Smith sat down with 9fin’s debt covenant expert James Wallick to talk about this strange situation and its possible implications.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode