Clearer Thinking with Spencer Greenberg Are scientific journals just parasites? (with Chris Chambers)
24 snips
Aug 7, 2022 
Chris Chambers, a cognitive neuroscience professor at Cardiff University, dives into the pressing issues within scientific publishing. He discusses outcome bias and its implications on research integrity, emphasizing the importance of transparency in sharing all results, even negative ones. Chambers highlights the flaws in traditional peer review processes and advocates for registered reports to enhance reliability. He also challenges the traditional academic metrics used for hiring and promotion, calling for a reformed approach to improve the credibility of scientific work.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Outcome Bias in Science
- Outcome bias in science leads to a distorted record that doesn't reflect reality.
- Allowing good science to be determined by desired results creates bias.
Clinical Trial Example
- A clinical trial on a drug yields negative results, so the researcher doesn't publish them.
- Other trials showing positive results get published, creating a biased record.
Publication Bias
- Outcome bias stems from researchers and journals.
- Negative results face difficulty in publication due to perceived lack of excitement.