Moral Relativism and the Natural Law | Prof. Francis Beckwith
Jun 10, 2024
auto_awesome
Prof. Francis Beckwith discusses moral relativism and natural law, challenging arguments supporting relativism based on disagreement and tolerance. Topics include abortion debates, natural law theory, enforcing fairness, and the implications of rejecting universal moral standards. The discussion highlights the Catholic Church's perspective on objective morality and the role of human nature in shaping moral beliefs.
Moral objectivism asserts universal moral rules like 'Love your neighbor', contrasting with relativism's cultural dependence.
Challenging the 'argument from tolerance,' the lecture questions relativism's fostering of true tolerance and universal principles.
Deep dives
Moral Objectivism vs. Moral Relativism
Moral objectivism asserts that moral rules are universal and not dependent on personal beliefs, while relativism claims that moral rules vary based on culture and individual perspective. The lecture discusses examples of moral rules such as 'Love your neighbor as yourself' and 'Do not take what is not yours without permission', contrasting them with immoral rules like race-based criminal trial outcomes. The speaker explains that belief in moral objectivism stems from the idea that morality transcends individual opinions, akin to mathematical truths, while relativism views morality as a subjective reflection of societal norms.
Critiques of Moral Relativism
The podcast scrutinizes the argument from moral disagreement, debunking the notion that diverse moral beliefs across cultures necessitate moral relativism. It highlights that disagreement does not inherently invalidate objective morality, using examples like historical acceptance of slavery to illustrate possible moral inaccuracies. The lecturer presents four issues with the argument from disagreement, including logical fallacies and the assumption that disagreement negates objective truth.
Disputing the Argument of Tolerance
The episode challenges the 'argument from tolerance,' which posits that moral relativism fosters tolerance by respecting diverse viewpoints. By analyzing how tolerance relies on universal principles like valuing peace and understanding, the lecture questions the compatibility of relativism with absolute moral standards. The speaker critiques the assumption that relativism leads to tolerance, demonstrating how relativism could also justify intolerance based on personal cultural preferences.
Implications of Natural Law Theory
The discussion transitions to the concept of natural law, suggesting that moral principles can be derived from human nature. The lecturer illustrates the universality of moral intuitions across cultures and time, referencing examples like truth-telling and life-saving dilemmas. By referencing figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Socrates, the podcast highlights how adherence to natural law principles transcends temporal and cultural boundaries, offering a framework for understanding moral disagreements and progress.