Philosopher's Zone

Disability, discrimination and disgust: why gut issues are a philosophical problem

5 snips
Aug 8, 2025
In this discussion, Jane Dryden, an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Mount Allison University, tackles the often-taboo subject of gut health and its philosophical implications. She explores how societal stigma leads to shame around digestive disorders, urging for open dialogue to foster understanding. Jane critiques traditional medical perspectives on disability, advocating for a social model that considers broader societal issues. Her insights highlight the deep connections between our bodily experiences and cultural perceptions, inviting listeners to rethink their attitudes toward gut health.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Gut Problems Are Extremely Common

  • David Rutledge highlights that gut disorders are extremely common, affecting roughly half of Australians each year.
  • Yet social silence and shame stop many from talking about or getting support for gut issues.
ANECDOTE

Asparagus Pee Reveals Bodily Remainders

  • Jane Dryden recalls Hegel's idea that digestion assimilates the other but leaves a remainder in the body.
  • She uses the familiar example of asparagus pee to illustrate bodily residues that resist total control.
INSIGHT

Lack Of Control Triggers Moral Shame

  • Jane Dryden explains gut issues become morally charged because they signal a loss of bodily control.
  • Society treats these failures as shameful, which amplifies stigma and silence around gut conditions.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app