

Episode 309: When Facts Aren’t Enough: Rethinking the Role of Fact-Checking
Jun 5, 2025
In this engaging discussion, Dr. Michelle A. Amazeen, a renowned expert in mass communication and misinformation from Boston University, tackles the evolving role of fact-checking. She dives into how fact-checking practices have evolved in journalism and the need for transparency in an age dominated by social media. Dr. Amazeen emphasizes the role of AI in identifying misinformation and the importance of pre-bunking to enhance media literacy. Her insights shed light on the disconnect between public expectations and the realities of fact-checking, making a compelling case for better audience engagement.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Pizzagate Attack Example
- The Pizzagate conspiracy led a man to attack a pizza shop with an assault rifle.
- This viral misinformation persisted even after thorough debunking, showing the danger of falsehoods.
Truth-Seekers vs Belief-Speakers
- Some people seek truth and are open to fact-checking, while others prioritize information that feels right.
- This difference describes truth-seekers versus belief-speakers in processing information.
Public Unawareness of Fact-Checking
- Many media consumers are unaware of fact-checking and its credibility standards.
- People often doubt fact-checkers' neutrality due to lack of transparency about their processes.