Library consultant Penny Hummel discusses how librarians are suppressing speech and intellectual diversity for the sake of social justice. They touch on incidents where speech was suppressed and emphasize the role of library staff in advocating for marginalized communities. They also discuss challenges in distinguishing fact, fiction, and opinion, the controversy surrounding drag queen story time, challenges to controversial books, preserving privacy and intellectual freedom, the evolving role of libraries, and encourage library activism.
Libraries are facing a growing trend of censorship attempts and the suppression of speech, undermining their role as champions of intellectual freedom and access to information.
Selective collection development in libraries, influenced by dominant ideologies, limits the representation of diverse viewpoints and undermines the principles of intellectual freedom and access to information.
Libraries face the challenge of serving marginalized communities while dealing with ideological battles, leading to the suppression of alternative viewpoints and compromising intellectual freedom and diversity of thought.
Deep dives
Challenges in Libraryland: Censorship Attempts and Suppression of Speech
One of the main issues in libraries today is the growing trend of censorship attempts and the suppression of speech. Libraries, which are meant to champion intellectual freedom and access to information, are now facing concerted efforts to ban books, displays, and programs. Some library staff themselves are leading the charge, objecting to certain viewpoints or topics. The dominant culture in libraries now promotes a specific ideology, and dissenting voices, especially those critical of gender ideology, face backlash and career obstacles. This suppression of speech not only harms libraries from within but also damages their reputation and public trust.
Controversial Content and Selective Collection Development
Libraries are facing controversies over the selection of certain books in their collections. The book 'I Am Jazz' by Jazz Jennings, a transgender activist, has received widespread praise and numerous library copies, whereas other books like 'My Body Is Me' by Rachel Rooney, which support children in their body, face vehement opposition and remain largely overlooked. The selection and promotion of books are influenced by dominant ideologies, leading to self-censorship and limited representation of diverse viewpoints. This selective collection development undermines the principles of intellectual freedom and access to information that libraries are supposed to uphold.
The Challenges of Serving Marginalized Communities and Balancing Ideologies
Libraries today face the challenge of serving marginalized communities while dealing with ideological battles. Some libraries are prioritizing the needs of marginalized groups, such as BIPOC and LGBTQ communities, which is necessary. However, this emphasis on particular identities often leads to the suppression of alternative viewpoints and censorship attempts. Meanwhile, the rise of a dominant culture in library professions, characterized by a specific set of ideological beliefs, creates a chilling effect on dissenting voices. As a result, librarians and library staff may feel compelled to conform to these beliefs, compromising intellectual freedom and diversity of thought.
Challenges faced by books with diverse perspectives in public libraries
The podcast discusses the challenges faced by books with diverse perspectives in public libraries. Specifically, it highlights cases where books have been challenged or removed from library collections due to their content. The speaker points out that while books from religious perspectives are often included, books with non-religious or non-traditional perspectives are less represented. The lack of diversity in library collections is seen as a concern, as it limits the range of viewpoints available to readers. The speaker also mentions the case of the book 'Irreversible Damage', which faced significant challenges and attempts to prevent its inclusion in libraries. Overall, the podcast episode highlights the importance of viewpoint diversity and freedom of expression in library collections.
The changing focus of libraries and the need for balance
The podcast explores the evolving role of libraries and the potential shift away from their traditional focus on literature. The discussion touches on the introduction of maker spaces and lending non-book items, which has expanded the scope of library services. However, concerns are raised about the potential loss of focus on literature and the implications for intellectual freedom. The speaker emphasizes the need for balance, acknowledging the value of traditional library services while also adapting to changing community needs. The challenges of maintaining a balance between different types of resources and catering to diverse interests are discussed. The podcast encourages individuals to engage with their libraries, submit book suggestions, and support library initiatives that promote intellectual freedom and inclusive collections.
Librarians once stood for intellectual freedom and access to information, but today many prefer to suppress speech and intellectual diversity for the sake of a misguided concept of "social justice". One Davis, California library recently violated the First Amendment when they ejected a group of women discussing male athletes in female sports. Collections and programs are regularly distorted and compromised by ideologue librarians, while those watching in dismay fear to speak. Library consultant and advocate Penny Hummel breaks the silence to tell the Dorx what’s really happening in America’s libraries.