In 'Only the Dead: The Persistence of War in the Modern Age,' Bear F. Braumoeller argues against the conventional wisdom that war is becoming less common. Using comprehensive data collection and modern statistical analysis, he demonstrates that interstate wars are as likely to break out and escalate as they have been in the past. Braumoeller emphasizes that the key to understanding trends in warfare lies in the formation of international orders, which can reduce conflict within their borders but also clash violently with other orders. The book provides a realistic assessment of humanity's efforts to abolish warfare, highlighting the successes and limitations of international institutions in preventing war.
In this book, Steven Pinker presents a detailed argument that violence has significantly decreased over the course of human history. He uses extensive data and statistical analysis to demonstrate this decline in various domains, including military conflict, homicide, genocide, torture, and the treatment of children, homosexuals, animals, and racial and ethnic minorities. Pinker identifies four key human motivations – empathy, self-control, the moral sense, and reason – as the 'better angels' that have oriented humans away from violence and towards cooperation and altruism. He also discusses historical forces such as the rise of the state (which he terms 'Leviathan'), the spread of commerce, the growth of feminist values, and the expansion of cosmopolitanism, which have contributed to this decline in violence[1][4][5].
Is war in long-term decline? Steven Pinker's The Better Angels of Our Nature brought this previously obscure academic question to the centre of public debate, and pointed to rates of death in war to argue energetically that war is on the way out.
But that idea divides war scholars and statisticians, and so Better Angels has prompted a spirited debate, with datasets and statistical analyses exchanged back and forth year after year. The lack of consensus has left a somewhat bewildered public (including host Rob Wiblin) unsure quite what to believe.
Today's guest, professor in political science Bear Braumoeller, is one of the scholars who believes we lack convincing evidence that warlikeness is in long-term decline. He collected the analysis that led him to that conclusion in his 2019 book, Only the Dead: The Persistence of War in the Modern Age.
Links to learn more, summary and full transcript.
The question is of great practical importance. The US and PRC are entering a period of renewed great power competition, with Taiwan as a potential trigger for war, and Russia is once more invading and attempting to annex the territory of its neighbours.
If war has been going out of fashion since the start of the Enlightenment, we might console ourselves that however nerve-wracking these present circumstances may feel, modern culture will throw up powerful barriers to another world war. But if we're as war-prone as we ever have been, one need only inspect the record of the 20th century to recoil in horror at what might await us in the 21st.
Bear argues that the second reaction is the appropriate one. The world has gone up in flames many times through history, with roughly 0.5% of the population dying in the Napoleonic Wars, 1% in World War I, 3% in World War II, and perhaps 10% during the Mongol conquests. And with no reason to think similar catastrophes are any less likely today, complacency could lead us to sleepwalk into disaster.
He gets to this conclusion primarily by analysing the datasets of the decades-old Correlates of War project, which aspires to track all interstate conflicts and battlefield deaths since 1815. In Only the Dead, he chops up and inspects this data dozens of different ways, to test if there are any shifts over time which seem larger than what could be explained by chance variation alone.
In a nutshell, Bear simply finds no general trend in either direction from 1815 through today. It seems like, as philosopher George Santayana lamented in 1922, "only the dead have seen the end of war".
In today's conversation, Bear and Rob discuss all of the above in more detail than even a usual 80,000 Hours podcast episode, as well as:
• Why haven't modern ideas about the immorality of violence led to the decline of war, when it's such a natural thing to expect?
• What would Bear's critics say in response to all this?
• What do the optimists get right?
• How does one do proper statistical tests for events that are clumped together, like war deaths?
• Why are deaths in war so concentrated in a handful of the most extreme events?
• Did the ideas of the Enlightenment promote nonviolence, on balance?
• Were early states more or less violent than groups of hunter-gatherers?
• If Bear is right, what can be done?
• How did the 'Concert of Europe' or 'Bismarckian system' maintain peace in the 19th century?
• Which wars are remarkable but largely unknown?
Chapters:
- Rob’s intro (00:00:00)
- The interview begins (00:03:32)
- Only the Dead (00:06:28)
- The Enlightenment (00:16:47)
- Democratic peace theory (00:26:22)
- Is religion a key driver of war? (00:29:27)
- International orders (00:33:07)
- The Concert of Europe (00:42:15)
- The Bismarckian system (00:53:43)
- The current international order (00:58:16)
- The Better Angels of Our Nature (01:17:30)
- War datasets (01:32:03)
- Seeing patterns in data where none exist (01:45:32)
- Change-point analysis (01:49:33)
- Rates of violent death throughout history (01:54:32)
- War initiation (02:02:55)
- Escalation (02:17:57)
- Getting massively different results from the same data (02:28:38)
- How worried we should be (02:34:07)
- Most likely ways Only the Dead is wrong (02:36:25)
- Astonishing smaller wars (02:40:39)
Producer: Keiran Harris
Audio mastering: Ryan Kessler
Transcriptions: Katy Moore
80,000 Hours Podcast 
