The end of fact checking on Meta, and the future of social media
Jan 13, 2025
auto_awesome
Robyn Urback, an opinion columnist known for her sharp insights, and CT Jones, a writer for Rolling Stone focusing on internet culture, delve into Meta's controversial end of fact-checking. They discuss how this shift blurs the line on objective truth and its potential dangers for democracy. The conversation turns to the impact on marginalized communities and the role of billionaires like Zuckerberg in shaping media narratives. They question the future of social media rhetoric and advocate for stronger local journalism as a counter to misinformation.
Meta's removal of fact-checking is perceived as a dangerous shift that could erode objective truth and harm journalism and democracy.
The decision to relax content moderation potentially normalizes hate speech and misinformation, disproportionately affecting vulnerable communities and public discourse.
Deep dives
Carrie Lowe's Case and Systemic Failures
Carrie Lowe's experience highlights significant systemic failures in the legal and law enforcement response to sexual assault cases. Despite her prompt reporting of the incident, her attackers remain unpunished due to mishandling by the police. This situation underscores the challenges faced by survivors in seeking justice within a flawed system that often prioritizes external biases over victims' rights. Lowe's story serves as a call to action, emphasizing the need for reform in how sexual assault cases are treated by authorities.
Meta's Shift Toward Looser Content Moderation
Meta's recent decision to relax content moderation and eliminate fact-checkers raises serious concerns about the potential spread of misinformation and hate speech. The new rules allow users to make derogatory comments based on gender and sexual orientation, effectively normalizing discourse that could harm vulnerable groups. Critics argue that this change creates an environment where hate speech can flourish, as individuals are given greater latitude to express harmful views without repercussions. This shift represents a departure from previous efforts to regulate harmful content, introducing a new era of online interaction that may have detrimental societal impacts.
Billionaires Influencing Public Discourse
The power dynamics between billionaires and social media platforms are increasingly evident as figures like Mark Zuckerberg reshape discourse to align with cultural trends. Zuckerberg's recent adjustments reflect a desire to cater to societal shifts rather than taking a principled stand against harmful narratives. This behavior illustrates a broader trend where wealth and influence dictate public conversation, often sidelining accountability for the implications of these changes. The relinquishing of responsibility for moderating harmful content demonstrates how billionaires can significantly impact the collective consciousness of society.
Mark Zuckerberg's decision to get rid of fact checking on all of Meta's platforms is being called an extinction-level event for the idea of objective truth on social media and an 'extremely dangerous time' for journalism and democracy. But is it really all that bad? Elamin is joined by wrtiers Robyn Urback and CT Jones to talk about how this decision could change the way we live.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode