Reversing Climate Change 382: Silicates vs. Carbonates: How the 1996 IPCC Report Created Enhanced Rock Weathering Path Dependency—w/ Dr. Tyler Kukla, CarbonPlan
Some decisions we don't expect to have big consequences. And yet, sometimes you wake up thirty years later in a world deeply altered by that little moment. Today's show is about when that happens in science.
Dr. Tyler Kukla is a Research Scientist at CarbonPlan, one of carbon removal's preeminent watchdog nonprofits. He returns to the show to explore how a conservative estimation of how much carbon returns to the atmosphere after agliming with carbonate rock (all of it) in the 1996 IPCC report has led us into a commercial carbon removal future that focuses almost entirely on silicate rock.
This isn't a story about whether silicates or carbonates are better for enhanced weathering (it really depends upon a number of geographic factors and design decisions around system boundaries and additionality), but about how some good faith placeholders can reify to such an extent that they do so much more than they were ever expected to.
This Episode's Sponsor
Listen to the RCC episode with Ryan Covington from Philip Lee LLP
Resources
Subscribe to the Reversing Climate Change Substack
Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories
"Scaling enhanced weathering in limed fields" by Tyler Kukla
"Evidence for carbon sequestration by agricultural liming" by Dr. Stephen K. Hamilton, et al