Troubleshooting Agile

Disputatiousness For Scientists

12 snips
Sep 17, 2025
Discover the importance of critical thinking and healthy intellectual disagreement in science and leadership. The hosts delve into John Platt's compelling essay, Strong Inference, explaining its four-step method and the significance of rigorous critique. They explore how a culture of psychological safety enables teams to address errors and accelerate growth. Plus, hear intriguing examples of A/B testing that challenge marketing assumptions. Embrace the art of dispute and engage in productive conversations!
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Design Experiments To Falsify

  • Strong inference requires generating multiple alternative hypotheses before testing.
  • Design experiments to exclude hypotheses rather than merely observe outcomes.
ADVICE

Run Crucial Experiments Regularly

  • Devise crucial experiments with outcomes that rule out specific hypotheses.
  • Repeat the cycle with refined sub-hypotheses to accelerate learning.
ANECDOTE

Marketing Subject-Line Bakeoff

  • Douglas recounts an e-commerce A/B test where a one-word subject line beat complex options.
  • They proved it by running simultaneous variants and eliminating competing hypotheses.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app