507: Melissa Clark Wrote a Very Critical, Extremely Buzzy New York Times Review of Per Se and the French Laundry
Dec 7, 2024
auto_awesome
Melissa Clark, a prolific cookbook author and interim restaurant critic for the New York Times, brings a fresh perspective on fine dining in her latest review of Thomas Keller's Per Se and the French Laundry. She delves into the tension between traditional and modern dining cultures, sharing her personal expectations versus reality at these acclaimed spots. The discussion also touches on the impact of anonymity in restaurant reviews, the quirks of contemporary desserts, and the importance of authentic culinary experiences over social prestige.
Modern dining experiences are evolving beyond mere meals, with diners increasingly seeking emotional connections and artistic expressions from chefs.
The contrasting fortunes of Per Se and the French Laundry highlight a potential complacency in high-end dining, questioning their commitment to culinary innovation.
Deep dives
The Evolution of Fine Dining Experiences
Fine dining experiences are shifting, with diners increasingly seeking more than just a meal. Many people desire unforgettable culinary experiences that evoke emotions and provide insights into a chef's vision, akin to experiencing art in a gallery. However, there remains a subset of diners who view visits to renowned establishments as a social status symbol, emphasizing external validation over authentic culinary enjoyment. This duality highlights the complexity of modern dining, where the motivations behind patronage can significantly vary.
Assessing the Current State of the Keller Empire
Reviews of famous restaurants like Per Se and the French Laundry reveal a contrasting reality for these once-iconic dining locations. The examination of these experiences shows that while the French Laundry still delivers excellence and a refined touch, Per Se appears to struggle with maintaining its glory, resulting in inconsistent dish quality and disappointing textures. Specific dishes once celebrated for their artistry seem to have lost their finesse, failing to meet the high expectations set by their legacies. This decline raises questions about complacency within high-end establishments and whether they continue to prioritize culinary innovation over comforting traditions.
Personal Motivations Behind Culinary Criticism
The heart of culinary criticism is often guided by personal experiences and expectations, as seen through the lens of familial connections. For critics, writing about food transcends mere assessment; it reflects a desire to help others experience the joy of genuinely remarkable meals, much like those that might have been savored together with loved ones. This perspective reinforces the idea that the industry needs to cater not just to affluent patrons, but to those seeking memorable moments and meaningful culinary journeys. Ultimately, the critic's role is to offer a voice to diners who value exceptional food experiences over social status, ensuring that the spirit of dining remains central to the narrative.
We had to break in on a Saturday with this very cool conversation with Melissa Clark. Melissa is a prolific cookbook author who wears several hats at the New York Times, where she’s currently a food reporter, recipe columnist, and the interim restaurant critic, serving alongside Priya Krishna. We’ve really enjoyed Melissa’s recent string of reviews, most of all her latest report from New York City and Napa, where she gave Thomas Keller’s pioneering restaurants, Per Se and the French Laundry, a fresh set of eyes. The review is a wild ride, and the internet was all over it. How did Melissa find her meals, and what does the current state of the Keller empire say about the modern age of fine dining? We go over it all in this great talk.
Do you enjoy This Is TASTE? Drop us a review on Apple, or star us on Spotify. We’d love to hear from you.