

Breaking Down the Massive Cuts to Science Funding
249 snips Jun 26, 2025
Emily Anthes, a science reporter at The New York Times, dives deep into the drastic cuts to scientific research funding under the Trump administration. She highlights how nearly 2,500 NIH grants have been halted, sparking uncertainty among researchers. Anthes discusses the emotional toll on scientists, especially those focusing on marginalized groups. She also explores the complex interplay between science and politics, emphasizing the potential long-term impact on innovation and scientific integrity. These changes could reshape the future landscape of scientific inquiry.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Massive NIH Grant Cancellations
- The Trump administration canceled over 1,700 NIH grants midstream, a highly unusual move.
- Many cut studies focus on marginalized populations, which the administration deems politically problematic.
Researcher Sees Funding Cut Coming
- Catherine Bogan studies sexual violence against bisexual women, a highly marginalized group.
- Despite its importance, her study was cut because of keywords like "bisexual" and "women".
Research Diversity Historically Neglected
- Medical research historically focused on a narrow, mostly white male population.
- Efforts to study women and minorities now face opposition under the current administration.