Full Story

Newsroom edition: the risks for Australia in backing US military action

Jun 26, 2025
Lenore Taylor, Editor of Guardian Australia, delves into the complexities of Australia's foreign policy regarding U.S. military actions. She discusses the legality of recent strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities and the Australian government's hesitant stance on military intervention. The conversation highlights Australia's ties with the U.S., raising questions about national sovereignty and regional safety. Taylor emphasizes the media's role in shaping public perception of these issues and calls for transparency in defense policy.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Australia's Hesitant Endorsement

  • The Australian government's initial hesitancy in endorsing US strikes on Iran reflected uncertainty about the full scope and legal basis of the attacks.
  • Eventually, Australia tacitly endorsed the strikes, balancing diplomatic caution with alliance loyalty to the US.
INSIGHT

Legal Ambiguity of Strikes

  • International law questions arose because the US strikes were preemptive and lacked clear legal justification under the UN Charter.
  • The Australian government dodged straightforward answers about legality, revealing ambiguity about the strikes' legitimacy.
INSIGHT

Concerns Over Executive Military Power

  • The limits of executive power in military actions remain unclear, with Trump acting without Congress's approval.
  • In Australia, decisions about joining conflicts also rest mainly with the prime minister, not Parliament, raising democratic concerns.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app