The Threat of Data Colonialism w/ Ulises A. Mejias & Nick Couldry
Oct 24, 2024
auto_awesome
Ulises A. Mejias, a Communication Studies professor, and Nick Couldry, a Media, Communications, and Social Theory professor, dive deep into the unsettling parallels between data colonialism and historical exploitation. They discuss how big tech’s data extraction practices echo the oppressive strategies of colonial powers. The conversation highlights the impact of algorithmic bias on marginalized communities and urges listeners to advocate for digital sovereignty. They also explore the importance of community agency in resisting these tech-driven frameworks.
Data colonialism mirrors traditional colonialism by exploiting human behavior and online activities for wealth and social control.
The construction of data centers exacerbates resource scarcity in disadvantaged communities, perpetuating a cycle of exploitation reminiscent of historical land grabs.
Grassroots movements advocate for local data sovereignty, empowering communities to reclaim data governance and prioritize public good over corporate profit.
Deep dives
Understanding Data Colonialism
Data colonialism is defined as an emerging social order focused on appropriating human life through the extraction of digital data. This concept asserts that, while traditional colonialism was about land grabs and resource extraction, modern data colonialism involves seizing previously unquantified assets such as human behavior and data generated from online activities. The process results in the generation of wealth and social control, creating profound inequalities in the digital age. The authors emphasize that despite the positive aspects of data use, the appropriation methods lead to exploitation, indicating a critical need to understand the complexities behind data extraction.
The Link Between Colonialism and Data Extraction
The relationship between traditional colonialism and data extraction is articulated through the metaphor of a land grab, while acknowledging the historical differences in violence associated with each. While past colonialism relied heavily on brutal force, today's data colonialism utilizes subtler mechanisms like algorithmic bias and market control. This comparison highlights the continuity of exploitation, yet distinctly notes that the violence of data colonialism manifests in other forms, such as discrimination and social inequalities woven into the fabric of the digital landscape. The authors propose that understanding this relationship can foster deeper insights into current tech industry dynamics.
Infrastructure and Resource Allocation
The construction of data centers and other tech infrastructure is compared to the historical exploitation of land in traditional colonialism. Data centers require immense physical resources, including electricity and water, sometimes exacerbating scarcity in local communities. These facilities, often built in economically disadvantaged areas with little community investment, contribute to an ongoing cycle of exploitation. As such, the authors assert that the expansion of data extraction industries places immense pressure on global resources and challenges democratic governance while prioritizing corporate interests.
Rising Movements and Community Sovereignty
Amidst the expanding data colonialism landscape, grassroots movements around the world advocate for community sovereignty in data usage and governance. These movements argue for a shift away from state-based data sovereignty, which often excludes marginalized groups, to a model that emphasizes the rights and needs of local communities. The authors support data collectives that track social harms and utilize data for community benefit, fostering a paradigm shift that prioritizes public good over corporate profit. This emerging approach encourages meaningful resistance against data exploitation while empowering communities to redefine how data is generated and utilized.
The Role of Technology and Resistance
Key technological advancements have historically facilitated both colonialism and contemporary data extraction, highlighting a deep interconnection between power structures and innovations. Although some tech solutions may appear benign, they often disguise underlying exploitative relationships, particularly towards marginalized groups. Resistance to these practices is critical, as seen in various initiatives aimed at re-empowering communities and advocating for ethical data practices. The authors highlight the need to reframe discussions around data and technology, steering conversations towards the interests of those harmed by data colonialism rather than solely focusing on corporate objectives.
Paris Marx is joined by Ulises A. Mejias and Nick Couldry to discuss how Silicon Valley's extractive data collection regime and the power it grants them resembles a much older form of exploitation: colonialism.
Ulises A. Mejias is a professor of Communication Studies at SUNY Oswego and Nick Couldry is a professor of Media, Communications and Social Theory at the London School of Economics. They are the co-authors of Data Grab: The New Colonialism of Big Tech and How to Fight Back and among the co-founders of the network Tierra Común.
Tech Won’t Save Us offers a critical perspective on tech, its worldview, and wider society with the goal of inspiring people to demand better tech and a better world. Support the show on Patreon.
The podcast is made in partnership with The Nation. Production is by Eric Wickham. Transcripts are by Brigitte Pawliw-Fry.
Home building in West London could be restricted until 2035 because data centers have used up the available energy.
Kenya is being drafted into the US’s anti-China tech alliance, which includes building data centers while ignoring the poor working conditions of data labelers and content moderators.
