

Plexiglass and Civility: The Vice-Presidential Debate
Oct 8, 2020
Alexander Burns, a national political correspondent for The New York Times, analyzes the recent vice-presidential debate between Mike Pence and Kamala Harris. They discuss the candidates' strategies amid the backdrop of the president's health issues, emphasizing the importance of demonstrating their qualifications. Topics include the civil yet sharp exchanges on COVID-19, contrasting responses to climate change, and contentious political challenges like fracking. Burn also highlights the focus on election integrity and recalls memorable moments from the debate.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Higher Stakes
- This year's vice presidential debate held higher stakes than usual.
- Both presidential candidates are over 70, emphasizing the importance of a capable VP.
Debate Objectives
- Pence aimed to stabilize the Republican ticket amidst the chaos surrounding Trump's illness and policy decisions.
- Harris's goal was to maintain the Democratic lead by focusing on the administration's pandemic failures.
Debate Setup
- Plexiglass shields separated the candidates, highlighting the pandemic's impact.
- The moderator, Susan Page, emphasized the need for a civil debate, unlike the previous presidential debate.