Ep. 230: Wilson vs. FDR: Who was worse for free speech?
Nov 25, 2024
auto_awesome
Christopher Cox, former House member and author of "Woodrow Wilson: The Light Withdrawn," debates free speech with David T. Beito, research fellow and author of "The New Deal’s War on the Bill of Rights." They dissect the repressive measures of Wilson during WWI, including the sedition laws, and draw parallels to FDR's wartime censorship and Japanese internment. The conversation reveals the complexities of both presidencies, questioning their legacies on civil liberties and exploring moments of regret over their actions.
Woodrow Wilson's presidency saw extreme censorship practices, particularly through the Espionage Act, suppressing dissent in the name of national security.
The brutal treatment of suffragists under Wilson highlighted a contradiction where a democracy-promoting president repressed those seeking voting rights.
Franklin D. Roosevelt's administration exhibited a consistent pattern of censorship, prioritizing wartime unity over individual liberties, notably through the internment of Japanese Americans.
Deep dives
Woodrow Wilson's Hostility Toward Free Speech
Woodrow Wilson's presidency marked a troubling era for free speech, largely defined by his actions during World War I. He implemented the Espionage Act, which criminalized any opposition to the war effort, effectively silencing dissent. Wilson sought even greater censorship powers than were granted by Congress, indicating a desire to suppress any public expression that could be construed as unpatriotic. This crackdown not only targeted anti-war activists but also suffragists advocating for women's right to vote, illustrating a broader pattern of suppressing civil liberties under the guise of national security.
The Silencing of Suffragists
The treatment of suffragists during Wilson's presidency exemplifies the extreme measures taken to control dissent. Protests outside the White House were met with violence from naval officers, while the suffragists themselves were arrested for simply holding banners that echoed Wilson's own rhetoric supporting democracy. This brutal response highlighted a paradox where a president championing democracy simultaneously authorized the repression of those seeking voting rights. The suffragists' plight galvanized public support for their cause, leading to a push for civil rights that challenged Wilson's authoritarian measures.
FDR's Consistent Push for Censorship
Franklin Delano Roosevelt's approach to free speech exhibited a troubling tendency towards censorship, often pressing his subordinates to implement stricter measures against dissent. While Wilson's administration faced pushback that occasionally tempered his suppressive policies, FDR consistently aimed to escalate the crackdown on anti-war criticism. This was evidenced by his efforts to eliminate anti-New Deal voices from radio networks, demonstrating a clear intent to control public discourse. Roosevelt's presidency, marked by significant civil rights violations, particularly the internment of Japanese Americans, showcased a willingness to prioritize wartime unity over individual liberties.
Comparison of Civil Liberties Records
When comparing the civil liberties records of Wilson and FDR, it becomes evident that both demonstrated a significant disregard for free speech, albeit in different contexts. Wilson's actions laid the groundwork for repressive measures that would later be expanded under FDR, who operated in a climate of heightened patriotism during World War II. Both presidents utilized legislative instruments like the Espionage Act and the Smith Act to target dissenters, though they faced differing levels of resistance. Ultimately, their legacies reflect a shared commitment to sacrificing civil liberties in the name of national security during turbulent times.
Impact of Historical Actions on Free Speech Advocacy
The actions taken by Wilson and FDR during their respective presidencies had lasting impacts on the landscape of free speech advocacy in America. Wilson's crackdowns during World War I catalyzed the formation of civil liberties organizations, paving the way for the establishment of the American Civil Liberties Union. Similarly, the repressive environment fostered by FDR's administration contributed to a renewed focus on civil rights and free speech, particularly in the wake of the Red Scare. These historical contexts serve as crucial moments that shaped future advocacy, underscoring the importance of vigilance against government overreach in the realm of free expression.
Woodrow Wilson or Franklin D. Roosevelt: which president was worse for free speech?
In August, FIRE posted a viral X thread, arguing that Woodrow Wilson may be America’s worst-ever president for free speech. Despite the growing recognition of Wilson’s censorship, there was a professor who wrote a recent book on FDR’s free speech record, arguing that FDR was worse.
Representing the Wilson side in our discussion is Christopher Cox, author of the new book, “Woodrow Wilson: The Light Withdrawn.” Cox is a former member of the House of Representatives, where he served for 17 years, including as chair of the Homeland Security Committee. He is currently a senior scholar in residence at the University of California, Irvine.