
Philosophy For Our Times Dreaming The Future | Natalie Bennett, Phillip Blond, Roger Scruton
Jan 24, 2017
Phillip Blond, a political theorist who champions localism and asset ownership. Natalie Bennett, ex-Green Party leader pushing imaginative environmental and social change. Roger Scruton, conservative philosopher defending tradition and local loyalties. They spar over whether utopias are dangerous or useful thought experiments. They debate local experiments, procedural politics, and how ideals meet real-world constraints.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Utopia As Warning Not Blueprint
- Utopian thinking tends to be either abstract and pleasant or concrete and oppressive.
- Roger Scruton warns utopia serves better as a cautionary boundary than as a literal political program.
Create Hopeful, Practical Visions
- Imagine concrete, democratic futures to inspire hope and action instead of fatalism.
- Natalie Bennett urges artists and thinkers to create realistic utopian visions that include risks and workable steps.
Ideal Must Accompany The Real
- Dangerous utopias start from abstract universals rather than concrete particulars.
- Phillip Blond argues ideals must accompany real examples to avoid solipsistic or sectarian projects.











