Jim Tankersley, an economic policy correspondent for The New York Times, dives into the challenges surrounding President Biden's Inflation Reduction Act that aimed to boost electric vehicle production. He discusses the unexpectedly slow consumer adoption of EVs despite significant federal incentives. The conversation highlights the impact on automakers considering massive investments, and explores consumer barriers like affordability and range anxiety. Tankersley emphasizes the need for bipartisan support to ensure sustainable growth in the electric vehicle market.
The Inflation Reduction Act has successfully encouraged manufacturing of electric vehicles in the United States, but its impact on consumer adoption has been limited due to high upfront costs and complex requirements for tax credits.
Proponents of the Inflation Reduction Act believe that the long-term investments in electric vehicle manufacturing and job creation will establish a sustainable industry in the United States, regardless of potential policy changes in the future.
Deep dives
The Inflation Reduction Act: Accelerating the Transition to Electric Vehicles Made in America
The Inflation Reduction Act, a key climate bill passed by congressional Democrats, aims to boost the production and adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) in the United States. While the law has successfully encouraged manufacturing of EVs in America, it has yet to significantly increase consumer adoption. Significant investments have been made to create a comprehensive supply chain for EVs in the country, including tax credits for mining critical minerals, processing raw materials into batteries, and establishing battery-making facilities. This has resulted in a boom of investment activity and the creation of new ecosystems in states like Michigan and the Mountain West. Furthermore, the law offers a $7,500 tax credit for buyers of EVs, but the complex requirements for the credit and the high upfront costs of EVs have hindered consumer uptake. Despite these early challenges, proponents believe that the long-term investments in EV manufacturing and the job creation involved will establish a sustainable EV industry in the United States, regardless of potential policy changes in the future.
The Fragile Path to EV Adoption: Efforts to Overcome Barriers and Boost Consumer Buying
While the Inflation Reduction Act has successfully incentivized EV manufacturing in America, its impact on consumer EV purchases has been limited. The availability of a $7,500 tax credit incentivizes EV purchases for eligible models, but cost remains a significant barrier for many potential buyers. Conventional gas-powered cars often present a more affordable option, especially for models that do not qualify for the tax credit. Additionally, concerns like limited charging infrastructure causing range anxiety further contribute to consumer reluctance. The Treasury Department's ruling allowing the full tax credit for leased EVs has resulted in a significant number of leased EVs, demonstrating the influence of incentives on buyer decision-making. Overall, while the law's current focus on manufacturing has shown success, future efforts are needed to address affordability and range anxiety to drive greater consumer adoption of EVs.
The Political Landscape: Fragility and Resilience of the EV Momentum
Support for continued EV growth faces potential challenges depending on future political shifts. A Democratic loss in the next presidential election may lead to attempts by Republicans to overturn and undermine policies promoting EVs. Hostility towards EVs has been voiced by influential figures in the Republican Party, such as Donald Trump, and there is skepticism about the Biden administration's efforts in this area. However, proponents argue that the substantial investments made in EV manufacturing across red and blue districts will create economic and political incentives to sustain the EV industry. By aligning the economic interests of various districts with EV manufacturing and job creation, it is hoped that overturning pro-EV policies would become politically challenging. Ultimately, the ability to drive EV sales and support consumer adoption will determine the long-term durability of the EV momentum, regardless of potential policy changes.
A little over a year ago, at President Biden’s urging, congressional democrats passed a sweeping plan to supercharge the production and sale of electric vehicles.
Jim Tankersley, who covers economic policy for The Times, explains whether the law is actually working.
Guest: Jim Tankersley, an economic policy correspondent for The New York Times.
Growth is brisk but slower than expected, causing automakers to question their multibillion-dollar investments in new factories and raising doubts about the effectiveness of federal incentives.
For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.
Unlock full access to New York Times podcasts and explore everything from politics to pop culture. Subscribe today at nytimes.com/podcasts or on Apple Podcasts and Spotify.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
