285 - What Do You Mean? - Celeste Kidd (rebroadcast)
Apr 14, 2024
auto_awesome
Psychologist Celeste Kidd discusses how semantic disagreements, like the hotdog sandwich debate, arise from conceptual misalignment. Exploring the complexities of human communication, understanding, and the impact of semantic variability on shared reality.
People often underestimate the differences in their conceptual understanding, leading to semantic disagreements.
Recognizing and navigating semantic disagreements is crucial for effective communication and collaboration in social and political interactions.
Deep dives
Research on Conceptual Misalignment
Research by psychologist Celeste Kidd delves into the variability of human concepts and how individuals often underestimate the differences in their conceptual understanding. Kidd's work shows that even with shared language and experiences, people's mental representations of concepts like penguins or politicians can vary significantly, leading to misunderstandings and challenges in communication and discourse.
Implications for Social and Political Discourse
Kidd's findings shed light on the importance of recognizing and navigating semantic disagreements in social and political interactions. The research indicates that people tend to assume others share their concepts more closely than they actually do, highlighting a key factor that may hinder effective communication and collaboration, particularly in complex and contentious discussions.
Role of Diversity in Knowledge and Conceptual Variability
The study suggests that the diversity in human knowledge and conceptual variability, including differing mental models and semantic representations, may serve as a strength for the species. By harnessing the breadth of individual expertise and perspectives within a population, humans can achieve remarkable feats, innovate, and collaborate effectively, capitalizing on the variability in knowledge and concepts.
Significance of Variability in Human Curiosity
Kidd discusses how human curiosity plays a crucial role in driving specialization and broadening knowledge across diverse domains. While individual understanding may vary, the collective diversity of knowledge and concepts fuels innovation and progress. This variation in concept alignment may offer unique perspectives and insights, contributing to the collaborative nature of human accomplishments and endeavors.
Well, that depends on your definition of a sandwich (and a hotdog), and according to the most recent research in cognitive science, the odds that your concept of a sandwich is the same as another person's concept are shockingly low.
In this episode we explore how understanding why that question became a world-spanning argument in the mid 2010s helps us understand some of the world-spanning arguments vexing us today.
Our guest is psychologist Celeste Kidd who studies how we acquire and conceptualize information, form beliefs around those concepts, and, in general, make sense of the torrent of information blasting our brains each and every second. Her most recent paper examines how conceptual misalignment can lead to semantic disagreements, which can lead us to talk past each other (and get into arguments about things like whether hotdogs are sandwiches).