What is (The) Enlightenment? In conversation with Jonathan Clark
Dec 3, 2024
auto_awesome
In this engaging conversation, historian Jonathan Clark delves into the complexities of The Enlightenment. He critiques modern interpretations, suggesting they often misrepresent the era's sociability and practices. Clark explores the French Enlightenment's diverse thinkers like Voltaire and Diderot, emphasizing nuanced historical narratives. He also unpacks Kant’s essay on intellectual freedom, challenging common perceptions about authority's role during the period. The discussion ultimately reflects on the Enlightenment’s ideals of universality and democracy in today's context.
The Enlightenment is often oversimplified in modern discourse, being used ideologically while its historical complexities are overlooked.
Contrary to popular belief, the Enlightenment was not a unified movement but a diverse collection of thoughts that emerged over time.
Deep dives
Reassessing the Enlightenment
The notion of the Enlightenment has been subject to varying interpretations and uses in contemporary discourse, often becoming a tool in ideological battles. Authors like Richard Dawkins and Steven Pinker repurpose the Enlightenment to align with their secular and scientific views, positing it as an antidote to contemporary religious and cultural phenomena they oppose. This perspective tends to project modern values onto 18th-century thinkers and movements, thereby distorting their original contexts and intentions. The underlying question arises: does this reinterpretation reflect the actual historical complexities of the Enlightenment, or does it create a simplified narrative that serves current ideological needs?
Historical Misconceptions
Contrary to popular belief, the Enlightenment was not a singular, well-defined movement during the 18th century but rather a complex array of thoughts and ideas that were never cohesively labeled as such at the time. Intellectual developments such as increased literacy and scientific discovery were significant, but these did not coalesce into a universally recognized Enlightenment movement until much later. The term 'Enlightenment' itself is a modern construct that emerged as historians sought to frame disparate ideas into a coherent narrative. Historical figures like Voltaire, Rousseau, and Locke contributed to a wide variety of intellectual conversations, each with distinct motivations and beliefs, often diverging from the simplified characterization of a united Enlightenment ideology.
The Role of Religion
The relationship between religion and science during the Enlightenment period was more complex than the general view of an antagonistic opposition. Many prominent Enlightenment thinkers, including Locke and Hume, were deeply engaged with theological questions, reflecting a society that remained largely Christian in thought and practice. The belief that the Enlightenment represents a full-blown secular shift ignores the nuanced ways in which religion and enlightenment thought coexisted and influenced one another. In many cases, intellectual pursuits in that era sought to reconcile faith with reason rather than eradicate religious belief altogether.
Contemporary Implications
The ongoing discussions surrounding the Enlightenment's significance reflect a dual purpose: as a means of evaluating past ideas and as a tool for navigating current ideological conflicts. Scholars like Jonathan Israel advocate for the Enlightenment's role in advocating universal values and challenging traditional hierarchies, but this stance is met with skepticism from others who point out the movement's failures to deliver promised utopias. The dominant narrative of the Enlightenment is constantly evolving, as contemporary thinkers aim to reclaim and reinterpret its legacy for modern causes. However, the challenge lies in discerning how well these historic ideas translate to today’s diverse and complex societal landscape, where a singular narrative may fail to encompass the nuances of human experiences.
The Enlightenment has become weaponised over recent years. Numerous public figures, not all of them historians, have lined up to state defiantly that it needs protecting from… postmodernity? populism? religion?… take your pick.
But what is - or was - The Enlightenment? What are we being called to defend here? Is The Enlightenment actually a thing? Was it even “a thing” in the first place? And if not, when did we start talking about it, and why?