Javier Blas, a Bloomberg opinion columnist with extensive experience in energy reporting, joins Axios's Ben Geman, who covers energy policy and climate issues. They dive into the mixed reactions of energy leaders at CERAWeek regarding a potential Trump 2.0 administration and its implications for U.S. energy policy. Key discussions include the worries about declining oil prices, the need for investment in energy security, and the lively debate on the future of clean energy technologies versus fossil fuels. Their insights shed light on the evolving landscape of global energy.
Falling oil prices are causing alarm among U.S. shale executives, with concerns that prices could drop to $50 a barrel.
CERA Week highlighted a diverse mix of stakeholders, emphasizing the importance of dialogue between traditional energy players and clean tech startups.
The conversation on energy transition has shifted towards pragmatism, with calls for increased oil and gas production amidst ongoing climate discussions.
Deep dives
Concerns About Low Oil Prices
The energy sector is currently facing significant anxiety regarding falling oil prices, with many executives expressing fears that prices could drop to as low as $50 a barrel. This level is concerning for the U.S. shale companies, which may struggle to remain profitable at such prices. Even though there was initially enthusiasm surrounding the pro-drilling stance of the Trump administration, executives are realizing that the administration's agenda aims to keep oil prices low to reduce gasoline costs for consumers. The mood at CERA Week reflected this tension, highlighting a departure from the expected celebrations typically associated with favorable policies.
CERA Week as a Benchmark for Industry Dynamics
CERA Week serves as a critical touchpoint for energy industry trends, with attendance from major players and government officials. This year's event showcased a diverse array of stakeholders, from oil executives to even startup ventures, emphasizing the breadth of the energy conversation. Behind the scenes, attendees are also aware of exclusive discussions and deal-making, indicating the conference's vital role in shaping industry narratives. Consequently, CERA Week is recognized as a barometer of prevailing attitudes towards energy policy and market dynamics.
Navigating the Energy Transition Discussion
The conversations around energy transition and climate change at CERA Week revealed a desire for realism and pragmatism among executives and policy-makers. Many participants highlighted the need for an increase in both oil and gas production, suggesting a retreat from the aggressive net-zero directives previously discussed. This shift reflects recognition of ongoing energy demands, particularly from emerging markets, and a growing skepticism about the pace of transitioning to renewable sources. Increasing calls for a balanced approach indicate that industry players are looking for sustainable long-term strategies rather than radical changes.
Rising Natural Gas Demand and Its Implications
Natural gas emerged as a focal point of discussion, particularly regarding its role in meeting rising electricity demands from data centers and other technologies. The Trump administration signaled a more supportive stance towards U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) exports, boosting optimism among attendees at the conference. However, concerns linger about potential over-reliance on American LNG, especially in light of geopolitical tensions and tariff policies that could influence energy security in Europe. The dialogue emphasized the dual necessity of maintaining domestic production while simultaneously addressing international energy market dynamics.
The Future of Clean Energy Technologies
While the presence of clean energy technologies at CERA Week was significant, there were mixed sentiments about the potential for these initiatives amidst shifting political landscapes. Various clean tech startups were represented, indicating a growing interest in low-carbon solutions, but some executives voiced concerns over the sustainability of existing tax credits under the Inflation Reduction Act. The need for stable policies and investment incentives was underscored, with a strong push for support for technologies such as carbon capture and sustainable aviation fuels. Overall, the outlook on clean energy remains cautiously optimistic but heavily dependent on future legislative developments.
Last week, energy industry leaders gathered in Houston for CERAWeek by S&P Global, one of the most important annual industry events focusing on the current state of energy markets, policy, and technology.
This year's conference took place against a backdrop of shifting global energy dynamics — declining oil prices, the Trump administration's "drill baby drill" agenda, growing concerns about energy security, geopolitical tensions, and ongoing debates about the pace and direction of the energy transition.
So what were the week’s key takeaways? How are energy leaders reacting to a second Trump administration? And what does the future of global energy markets look like?
This week host Jason Bordoff talks with two energy reporters — Bloomberg’s Javier Blas and Axios’s Ben Geman — about their takeaways from CERAWeek and what they heard on and off stage.
Javier is an opinion columnist for Bloomberg, covering energy and commodities. He was previously at the Financial Times where he held various positions including roles as the Africa editor and the commodities editor.
Ben is an energy and climate reporter at Axios. He is the co-author of the daily Axios Generate newsletter and covers the world of energy business and policy. He previously covered these topics for National Journal, The Hill, and E&E News.
Credits: Hosted by Jason Bordoff and Bill Loveless. Produced by Erin Hardick, Mary Catherine O’Connor, Caroline Pitman, and Kyu Lee. Engineering by Sean Marquand. Stephen Lacey is executive producer.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
