The discussion dives into the tug-of-war between nationalism and internationalism, highlighting their evolving dynamics amidst today’s geopolitical tensions. Cultural aspects of internationalism are examined, raising questions about its perception in a post-9/11 world. Personal journeys reshape understandings of national identity, with experiences revealing the complexities of belonging. The tension between these ideologies is explored, emphasizing the transformation of nationalism from unity to division in contemporary society.
18:01
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Shifting Internationalism
Perry Anderson's essay analyzes the shift of internationalism from a left-wing ideal to a tool of state power.
This challenges the traditional association of internationalism with positive connotations.
insights INSIGHT
Internationalism's Political Shift
Internationalism has evolved from a core left-wing principle to a concept dominated by the right.
This transformation challenges the left's traditional embrace of internationalism.
insights INSIGHT
Internationalism vs. Nationalism
Internationalism, unlike nationalism, is typically viewed positively, despite its complexities.
Nationalism has evolved from positive 19th-century connotations to negative associations with populism and ethnic conflict.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Perry Anderson's "Internationalism: A Breviary" is a concise yet insightful essay that examines the complex relationship between nationalism and internationalism. Anderson traces the evolution of these concepts from the American Revolution to the post-9/11 era, highlighting their shifting political valences. He challenges the conventional left-leaning association with internationalism, demonstrating how it has become increasingly intertwined with state power. The essay's analysis provides a critical perspective on the limitations and contradictions inherent in both nationalism and internationalism. Anderson's work encourages a reevaluation of these concepts in the context of contemporary global politics.
The Invention of tradition
Eric Hobsbawm
Terence O. Ranger
This book, edited by Eric Hobsbawm and Terence Ranger, examines the concept of 'invented traditions,' which are cultural practices presented as having a long history but are actually of recent origin. The essays cover various topics such as the creation of Welsh and Scottish national cultures, the elaboration of British royal rituals, and the origins of imperial rituals in British India and Africa. The book highlights how these invented traditions were used to foster social cohesion, legitimize institutions, and solidify value systems and beliefs. It also explores the complex interaction between past and present and how these traditions were constructed to serve specific historical and political needs[1][2][4].
Nations and Nationalism
Ernest Gellner
In this book, Gellner interprets nationalism in terms of its social roots, locating it in industrial social organization. He argues that industrialization necessitated a homogeneous cultural foundation, facilitated by a standardized system of education and communication, leading to the formation of distinct national identities. Gellner posits that nationalism is not an age-old phenomenon but rather a product of modern societal development, driven by the transformation from agrarian to industrial societies. The book emphasizes the role of centralized education systems, mass media, and the alignment of culture and statehood in shaping modern national identities[1][2][4].
On Perry Anderson's "Internationalism: A Breviary".
We kick off the second block/theme of the 2024/25 Reading Club on Nations & Internationalism in the 21st Century by looking at a 2002 essay which charts nationalism against internationalism from the Atlantic revolutions through to the age of globalisation. It is particularly apposite to revisit this text in light of an acceleration in de-globalisation brought on by the second Trump presidency.
What are the cultural aspects of "internationalism"?
While nationalism can be good or bad, internationalism is usually seen as positive. Is this still the case?
How has internationalism accompanied, seperated from or stood against nationalism throughout the latter's history?
How is internationalism different from cosmopolitanism today, if at all?
How could we update Anderson's charting of internationalism along 5 coordinates: capital, geography, philosophy, nation-definition, and class relations?
Bungacast 
