
GD POLITICS Is Venezuela The Next Iraq?
Dec 18, 2025
Michael O'Hanlon, a defense policy expert at the Brookings Institution, discusses the escalating tensions between the U.S. and Venezuela. He argues that recent military actions might legally amount to war, while noting that outright invasion is unlikely. O'Hanlon situates these developments within the historical Monroe Doctrine, addressing Trump's motivations in targeting Maduro. He emphasizes the need for congressional debate on military intervention and cautions against using economic interests as a justification for conflict.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Limited Hemisphere Intervention Model
- The U.S. approach to Venezuela will likely mirror limited-era hemispheric interventions rather than full invasions.
- Michael O'Hanlon expects air power, special forces, and a blockade rather than a large ground occupation.
Historical Doctrine Shapes Today's Moves
- The Monroe Doctrine and Roosevelt Corollary shaped U.S. readiness to intervene in the Western Hemisphere.
- O'Hanlon ties Trump's posture to historic U.S. claims of regional prerogative and limited interventions near shore.
Recent Precision Strikes As A Template
- Michael O'Hanlon recounts recent U.S. uses of precision strikes and special operations as models Trump admires.
- He cites examples like killing Soleimani, strikes on Iran, and air campaigns against ISIS as illustrative precedents.
