
We the People
Presidential Immunity From the Founding to Today
Jul 12, 2024
Law professors Sai Prakash and Michael McConnell discuss the Supreme Court's ruling on presidential immunity, exploring historical perspectives, evolution of presidential power, constraints on immunity, and interpretations of Federalist 77. They delve into the balance of powers, executive authority, and implications for the behavior of executive officials.
53:39
Episode guests
AI Summary
Highlights
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- Presidents have presumptive immunity from prosecution for official acts, not unofficial acts.
- The Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity does not align with the original understanding of the Constitution.
Deep dives
Supreme Court ruling grants presidential immunity for official acts
The recent Supreme Court ruling in Trump v. United States established that the president enjoys presumptive immunity from prosecution for official acts, with a 6-3 decision. While the decision does not align with the original understanding of the Constitution, it has deep-rooted grounds in pragmatic considerations recognized in previous court decisions. The immunity from prosecution extends to a defined scope of official acts, signaling future decisions on immunity for presidential conduct.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.