Designed for Learning

AI, Cheating, and Trusting Students to be Human

Jul 10, 2025
Tricia Bertram Gallant, the Director of the Academic Integrity Office at UC San Diego and co-author of 'The Opposite of Cheating,' dives into the complexities of academic dishonesty in the age of AI. She explains why students cheat, emphasizing that motivations aren't new but have evolved. The conversation explores moral justifications that enable cheating and offers practical strategies for educators to foster integrity. Tricia also advocates for innovative assessment methods to rebuild trust and communicate more effectively with students about their learning.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Why Students Cheat

  • Students cheat because they are human and driven by extrinsic motivations.
  • Cheating stems from perceiving assignments as just tasks to complete rather than meaningful learning.
INSIGHT

Neutralizing as Moral Justification

  • People use moral justifications to neutralize guilt when cheating or breaking rules.
  • Training students to listen to their gut and test their actions against values can reduce cheating.
INSIGHT

Don’t Make Students Guess Purpose

  • Students shouldn't have to guess why assignments matter or their learning value.
  • Instructors must clearly communicate the purpose and human skills developed by assignments.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app