Exploring the complexity of historical narratives, the podcast challenges the conventional idea of historians as uncoverers of truth. It delves into how cultural and political factors shape historical interpretation, emphasizing the subjectivity and ethical responsibility in constructing historical truths. The conversation also touches on the epistemic value of historical narratives and the importance of recognizing different perspectives in understanding historical events.
Historians construct historical meaning through narratives, not just uncover facts.
Narratives offer diverse perspectives and challenge basic beliefs for transformative thinking.
Deep dives
Historical Realism and Its Ontological and Epistemological Commitments
Historical realism involves an ontological commitment to a structured past with inherent meaning that historians can access through sources. It also includes an epistemological commitment that with a proper methodology, historians can unveil the past's meaning for the present.
Critiques of Realism from Philosophers like Hayden White and Arthur Danto
Philosophers like Hayden White argue that historians are active in creating historical meaning, influenced by cultural and political structures. Arthur Danto's ideal chronicler concept highlights that the future can provide clarity on past events, altering interpretations. These critiques challenge the notion of a singular, objective historical truth.
Challenges to Realism: Narratives as Cognitive Instruments and Meaning Constructors
Lois Mink's view that stories are told, not lived, underlines how narratives impose order on chaotic reality, offering varied perspectives. Narratives are seen as cognitive instruments that shape understanding rather than solely conveying factual knowledge. By asserting the ethical responsibility of historians in constructing historical meaning, narratives are positioned as complex interpreters of the past.
Evaluating Historical Narratives for Epistemic Value and Nuanced Understanding
The discussion emphasizes evaluating historical narratives based on their ability to challenge basic beliefs and offer nuanced perspectives on events. The concept of non-aggregation suggests that historical understanding involves critically assessing conflicting narratives to unlock diverse insights. The goal is to move beyond simplistic interpretations towards narratives that spark transformative thinking and ethical reflection.
Historians are commonly thought of as being a little like archaeologists or scientists - they're in the business of uncovering facts, and then presenting those facts to the public as accurately as possible. But this week we're considering history as a species of narrative, and the historian as someone who doesn't "discover" the meaning of the past but constructs it.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode