Alana Newhouse, founder and editor-in-chief of Tablet Magazine, offers keen insights into America’s institutional divides. She introduces the concept of 'Brokenism,' exploring the clash between those wanting to repair institutions versus those pushing for their dismantlement. Newhouse highlights the emotional impact of systemic failures on individuals and critiques the increasing political polarization. The conversation encourages a deeper understanding of historical contexts and challenges everyone to engage constructively in the evolving political landscape.
The concept of 'brokenism' highlights a significant political divide focused on repairing versus dismantling American institutions, transcending traditional ideological labels.
Shared outrage across the political spectrum signifies a collective demand for change, necessitating constructive political dialogue to channel dissatisfaction into actionable solutions.
Deep dives
Understanding Brokenism
The concept of brokenism is introduced as a framework for analyzing current political divides in America. It posits that the most significant divide is not along traditional left-right lines, but between those who seek to repair existing institutions and those who favor their complete destruction. This notion underscores a growing sentiment of dissatisfaction with American systems, leading to a pervasive belief that such institutions are inadequate or beyond repair. By distinguishing between 'brokenists' and 'status quoists,' the discussion opens up new avenues for understanding political engagement in contemporary society.
Shared Outrage Across the Spectrum
A key point is the recognition of shared outrage among individuals across the political spectrum, driven by a common perception that the current systems are failing. This collective frustration can be observed in various examples, such as teachers' strikes and dissatisfaction with political proposals like the Build Back Better agenda that claim to be cost-free. This outrage serves as a unifying force that transcends typical ideological barriers, pointing to a broader societal consensus on the need for change. The real challenge lies in translating this outrage into constructive political dialogue and action.
The Vital Debate on Institutions
The discussion emphasizes the importance of the debate surrounding the health and viability of America's institutions as central to future political discourse. Brokenists view these institutions as fundamentally flawed and argue that instead of reforming them, efforts should focus on creating new alternatives. Conversely, status quoists advocate for preserving and improving the existing framework, valuing the stability and opportunities these institutions have historically provided. This dichotomy suggests that the path forward hinges on how society collectively perceives the effectiveness of these institutions in serving the public good.
Navigating the Tension Between Change and Tradition
There is an exploration of the potential dangers of entirely abandoning current institutions without viable replacements in mind. While brokenists may feel justified in their critiques and the desire for radical change, the discussion warns that such a perspective must be balanced with awareness of what a transition might entail. It interrogates the reality of historical shifts, noting that significant change often comes with instability and unpredictability, which might not yield the desired outcomes. Ultimately, the conversation advocates for a nuanced understanding where acknowledging flaws in systems must coexist with an effort to build feasible alternatives.
Alana Newhouse, founder and editor-in-chief of Tablet Magazine, says that may be the most important political question in America.
In an essay published more than two years ago, Newhouse argued that there is a new political divide, one in which your place — and the place of your allies and adversaries — is determined by whether you believe that America’s institutions should be fixed or destroyed. Her argument feels eerily prescient in light of the Trump administration’s recent efforts to dismantle government programs.
In this episode, which first aired in February of 2023, Alana and Sean debate what that divide means for America’s present and future, and whether it supersedes labels like "left" or "right" and "Democrat" or "Republican."
Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area