Prof. Candace Vogler discusses Aristotle's concepts of potency and actuality, teleology, and actuation. The conversation delves into how potency drives change, the relationship between teleology and goodness, and how individuals creatively interact with materials to achieve their goals.
Potentialities in Aristotle's philosophy lead to actualities, as seen in the example of soldiers using radio transmitters.
Substances have internal principles of change, while artifacts require external agents for transformation, highlighting Aristotle's exploration of nature.
Deep dives
Potency and Actuality in Aristotle's Philosophy
Aristotle's discussion of potency and actuality revolves around the concepts of potentiality and realization. He emphasizes that potencies are powers that lead to actualities. For example, the transformative process of soldiers using simple materials as radio transmitters in World War II was a demonstration of potentialities being actualized.
Substance and Nature in Aristotle's Metaphysics
Aristotle's exploration of substance and nature points to the inherent principles that govern change and development. He distinguishes between substances and artifacts, highlighting how natural objects possess internal principles of change, while artifacts rely on external agents for transformation.
Teleology and the Expression of Substantial Nature
A key aspect in Aristotle's philosophy is teleology, where the expression of substantial nature is linked to purposive changes that align with the inherent form of an object. This teleological perspective highlights how changes reflect the essence and nature of a substance.
Passive Potencies and the Role of Teleology
The discussion on passive potencies delves into the nature of change and the distinction between natural inclinations and external influences. Aristotle's emphasis on the teleological aspect of change sheds light on how potencies are inherent to substances and are realized through purposeful actions.