Washington Post, LA Times Pulling Harris Endorsements Spark Outrage
Oct 30, 2024
auto_awesome
Mariel Garza, a journalist and former editorial editor of the Los Angeles Times, discusses the editorial board's internal conflicts over endorsements. David Folkenflik from NPR highlights the influence of billionaire ownership in media. Sewell Chan, from the Columbia Journalism Review, delves into the broader implications of not endorsing candidates, questioning media integrity and public trust. The trio examines why endorsements matter in a polarized landscape and the ethical dilemmas faced by journalists when balancing personal beliefs with professional duties.
The decision by the Washington Post and LA Times to withhold endorsements for Kamala Harris raises concerns about ownership influence on editorial integrity.
The backlash over these non-endorsements highlights the public's demand for journalistic accountability amidst fears of elitism and perceived bias.
Deep dives
Editorial Independence and Ownership Influence
The recent decision by the Washington Post and the Los Angeles Times not to endorse Kamala Harris for president highlights the tension between editorial independence and the influence of newspaper owners. Both publications had prepared endorsements, but Jeff Bezos and Patrick Soon-Shiong, the respective owners, opted against them, citing a desire for perceived impartiality. This reversal has raised concerns about how ownership can impact editorial decisions, particularly in a politically charged climate. Critics argue that such decisions appear to serve the interests of the owners over the journalistic values of accountability and democratic engagement.
Consequences of Non-Endorsement
The backlash from the non-endorsement has been significant, leading to a loss of approximately 200,000 subscribers at the Washington Post, demonstrating the public's frustration with perceived bias or inaction. Subscribers and critics have voiced concerns that the decision signals a retreat from democratic principles at a time when active journalism is crucial. This reaction underscores the delicate balance newspapers must strike between maintaining credibility and the potential fallout from ownership decisions linked to market pressures. Many individuals who value journalistic integrity feel that ending endorsements can lead to diminished trust in media institutions, especially during pivotal elections.
The Role of Editorial Boards
The role of editorial boards in newspapers has come under scrutiny, raising questions about their relevance in the modern media landscape. Many argue that endorsements serve to guide public opinion and reflect thorough coverage of candidates, particularly in local races where voters may lack information. However, opponents of the practice suggest that the structure of these boards can contribute to a perception of elitism and lack of transparency. The calls for reform have led to discussions on individual accountability of journalists rather than reliance on an anonymous editorial board.
Impact of Media Ownership on Journalism
The phenomenon of billionaire ownership of media outlets has galvanized discussions about the potential conflicts between business interests and journalistic integrity. Critics contend that owners, such as Bezos and Soon-Shiong, may prioritize their financial stakes over independent journalism, particularly in a politically polarized environment. The situation raises ethical concerns about self-censorship within media organizations that are expected to combat disinformation and support democracy. As media landscapes evolve, the relationship between logistical control and content integrity becomes increasingly pivotal for maintaining public trust.
Two major newspapers, the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post, will not publish planned endorsements for Kamala Harris for president. Those decisions, made last week after editorial boards at both papers their endorsements, have sparked outrage, hundreds of thousands of canceled subscriptions, and staff resignations. In an op-ed in the Washington Post, owner Jeff Bezos wrote, “What presidential endorsements actually do is create a perception of bias. A perception of non-independence. Ending them is a principled decision, and it’s the right one.” But many observers point out that the very role of editorial boards is to take a stance. We’ll talk about newspaper editorial boards, why they endorse or don’t endorse candidates, and what’s at stake.
Guests:
David Folkenflik, media correspondent, NPR News
Mariel Garza, journalist, former editorials editor of the Los Angeles Times
Sewell Chan, executive editor, Columbia Journalism Review
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode