Tokenized

Stablecoins vs. Tokenized Deposits — What Do Banks Want?

16 snips
Dec 8, 2025
In this discussion, Rachel Mayer, VP of Product at Circle, and Nick van Eck, CEO of Agora, dive into the dynamic world of stablecoins and tokenized assets. They highlight the explosive growth of stablecoins, pointing out their $300 billion market compared to just $20–25 billion for other tokenized assets. The duo also examines the regulatory landscape, including the potential impacts of the GENIUS Act. Debating tokenized deposits versus stablecoins, they explore safety, utility, and the challenges banks face in adapting to this rapidly evolving financial ecosystem.
Ask episode
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
INSIGHT

Instant Finality Is The Killer Feature

  • Tokenization's killer features are instant finality and dramatically faster settlement, which increase capital velocity and lower settlement risk.
  • Nick van Eck and Rachel Mayer argue these properties will reshape corporate cash management and market efficiency.
INSIGHT

Stablecoins Outpaced Tokenized Assets

  • Stablecoins have exploded to ~ $300B while non-stablecoin tokenized assets sit near $20–25B, showing a multi-year adoption lead for stablecoins.
  • The speakers expect tokenized real-world assets to grow substantially but likely on a different timeline and regulatory path.
ANECDOTE

Tax Day Delay Illustrates Settlement Friction

  • Nick recounts selling assets on Fidelity on tax day where cash settlement took three days, illustrating settlement frictions.
  • He uses this to show how tokenization removes such windows and improves working capital efficiency.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Get the app