The Political Orphanage The Ethics of Performing for Dictators
Oct 16, 2025
Turner Sparks, a stand-up comedian known for his sharp wit, and Michael Ira Kaplan, a seasoned comic and real estate expert, dive into the ethical dilemmas surrounding performances in authoritarian regimes. They tackle the Riyadh Comedy Festival controversy, debating whether comedy can promote liberal ideas despite heavy restrictions. Sparks argues against accepting gigs that may endorse oppressive governments, while Kaplan explores the role of personal ethics and the challenges comedians face when tailoring their sets under censorship.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Festival Sparks 'Artwashing' Debate
- The Riyadh Comedy Festival provoked debate because prominent comedians accepted government-funded gigs in a repressive state.
- Critics argue performing there risks legitimizing or 'artwashing' the regime's human rights abuses.
Personal Refusal And Backlash Example
- Turner Sparks shares he would personally refuse any government-funded gig he disagrees with, viewing it as an endorsement.
- He cites artists like Jessica Kirsten facing backlash and donating fees after criticism.
Check Contracts For Speech Restrictions
- Read and evaluate contract restrictions before accepting international gigs; some clauses bar criticizing the host country or religion.
- Avoid shows that explicitly prohibit material about the regime or religion if that conflicts with your principles.
