BI 204 David Robbe: Your Brain Doesn’t Measure Time
Jan 29, 2025
auto_awesome
David Robbe, a neuroscientist and leader of the Cortical-Basal Ganglia Circuits and Behavior Lab, dives into how we perceive time beyond traditional measurements. He challenges the notion of a 'clock' in our brains, suggesting that time estimations come from our interactions with the environment. Robbe explores the intriguing link between behavior and neural timing, highlights Bergson's philosophy on time and memory, and contrasts human cognition with AI's mechanical processing, raising questions about free will and survival instincts.
David Robbe argues that our understanding of time is not based on an internal clock but rather on interactions with our environment.
Experiments with rodents suggest their time perception is tied to learned behaviors and environmental cues rather than analytical time tracking.
The philosophical insights of Henri Bergson raise questions about the limitations of neuroscience in categorizing and measuring subjective experiences of time.
Deep dives
Understanding Time Measurement
Time measurement is explored through the idea that regular external changes provide a framework for us to track time, rather than relying solely on an internal clock. This notion implies that our perception of time is not a straightforward internal measurement but is influenced by interactions with our surroundings. Each moment is marked by both personal experiences and external cues which create a sense of duration. This framework challenges traditional views held by neuroscientists seeking specific brain regions responsible for time tracking, suggesting that time may be a relational concept intrinsically tied to our environment.
David Robb's Perspective on Time
Neuroscientist David Robb emphasizes that humans do not possess an internal clock in their brains; instead, he suggests that our estimation of time arises from interactions with the world. He highlights the importance of behaviors rather than internal mechanisms, arguing that our comprehension of time is rooted in lived experiences. Through experiments, Robb reveals that animals, such as rodents, do not consciously keep track of time but develop intuitive routines based on their actions and environmental cues. This view aligns with the philosophy of Henri Bergson, who framed time as a subjective experience shaped by our ongoing interactions with life.
Experimental Insights from Rodent Behavior
Robb's experiments with rodents demonstrate surprising behaviors that challenge traditional views on time perception. In a task designed to measure time intervals, the rodents exhibit what appears to be superstitious behavior, relying on learned motor routines rather than an analytical understanding of time. This raises questions about the reliability of time estimation tasks and whether they genuinely measure time or are influenced by animal behavior. The findings indicate that rodents respond based on learned actions linked to rewards, suggesting that their sense of time is fundamentally practical and tied to their movement.
The Role of Bergson’s Philosophy in Neuroscience
Bergson's philosophy is threaded throughout the conversation, particularly regarding the concepts of duration and the subjective experience of time. He posits that our experiences cannot be easily reduced or dissected into simple components, which has repercussions for how we perceive time and behavior. His emphasis on the uniqueness of each moment and the continuous flow of experience challenges conventional scientific approaches that categorize and measure discrete units. This philosophical lens offers a critical reflection on the limitations of neuroscience when considering the richness of human experience, highlighting the need for creative thought in scientific exploration.
Philosophy's Value in Scientific Inquiry
The conversation highlights an increasing recognition of the interdependence of science and philosophy in understanding complex subjects like time. There is a growing sentiment within the scientific community that philosophical perspectives can enhance the understanding of scientific problems, offering nuanced approaches to research questions. For instance, thought-provoking questions stemming from philosophical inquiry can lead to innovative experimental designs and interpretations. This dialogue advocates for a symbiotic relationship between philosophy and neuroscience, where insights from both fields can inform and enrich one another.
The Limitations of AI in Understanding Time
The discussion transitions to the implications of Bergson's concepts in the context of artificial intelligence. It is suggested that current AI systems operate on fixed algorithms that lack the fluidity and subjectivity inherent in living beings. While machines can track time with precision, they do not possess the dynamic experience of time that humans do. This poses an insight into how AI lacks the internalized perception and emotional responses to time that living organisms experience, raising questions about the implications of incorporating human-like experiences into AI systems.
Support the show to get full episodes, full archive, and join the Discord community.
The Transmitter is an online publication that aims to deliver useful information, insights and tools to build bridges across neuroscience and advance research. Visit thetransmitter.org to explore the latest neuroscience news and perspectives, written by journalists and scientists.
To explore more neuroscience news and perspectives, visit thetransmitter.org.
When you play hide and seek, as you do on a regular basis I'm sure, and you count to ten before shouting, "Ready or not, here I come," how do you keep track of time? Is it a clock in your brain, as many neuroscientists assume and therefore search for in their research? Or is it something else? Maybe the rhythm of your vocalization as you say, "one-one thousand, two-one thousand"? Even if you’re counting silently, could it be that you’re imagining the movements of speaking aloud and tracking those virtual actions? My guest today, neuroscientist David Robbe, believes we don't rely on clocks in our brains, or measure time internally, or really that we measure time at all. Rather, our estimation of time emerges through our interactions with the world around us and/or the world within us as we behave.
David is group leader of the Cortical-Basal Ganglia Circuits and Behavior Lab at the Institute of Mediterranean Neurobiology. His perspective on how organisms measure time is the result of his own behavioral experiments with rodents, and by revisiting one of his favorite philosophers, Henri Bergson. So in this episode, we discuss how all of this came about - how neuroscientists have long searched for brain activity that measures or keeps track of time in areas like the basal ganglia, which is the brain region David focuses on, how the rodents he studies behave in surprising ways when he asks them to estimate time intervals, and how Bergson introduce the world to the notion of durée, our lived experience and feeling of time.
0:00 - Intro
3:59 - Why behavior is so important in itself
10:27 - Henri Bergson
21:17 - Bergson's view of life
26:25 - A task to test how animals time things
34:08 - Back to Bergson and duree
39:44 - Externalizing time
44:11 - Internal representation of time
1:03:38 - Cognition as internal movement
1:09:14 - Free will
1:15:27 - Implications for AI
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode