Special Episode: Robert Alpert, Merle Eisenberg, Lee Mordechai & Diseased Cinema
Jan 21, 2025
auto_awesome
Join Robert Alpert, an intellectual property lawyer turned film professor, along with historical experts Merle Eisenberg and Lee Mordechai, as they dive into the intriguing world of disease-themed movies. They discuss the evolution of cinematic portrayals of pandemics, revealing how narratives shifted from heroic to personal struggles. The conversation touches on societal reflections during crises, viewer motivations during COVID-19, and the importance of inclusive storytelling. Get ready for a captivating exploration of how film mirrors our hopes and fears about health!
The evolution of disease-themed films reflects shifting societal values, transitioning from heroic portrayals of government institutions to skepticism towards authority figures amidst a backdrop of individualism.
The underrepresentation of marginalized communities in disease films raises concerns about reinforcing stereotypes and failing to address the socio-economic and racial disparities in public health narratives.
Deep dives
The Evolution of Disease Movies
The narrative landscape of disease-themed films has significantly shifted over the decades, reflecting societal changes and cultural anxieties. Early films, predominantly from the 1920s to the 1980s, often depicted heroic doctors affiliated with the government sacrificing personal interests for the greater good. As the landscape evolved, particularly in the 1990s, the portrayal of these heroes began to shift toward more personal motivations, with individuals increasingly portrayed as looking out for family or personal success. The late 20th and early 21st centuries have seen a rise in apocalyptic narratives, showcasing chaos and individual struggles amidst global pandemics, indicating a growing distrust in institutions and a corresponding rise in individualism.
Cinematic Reflections of Society
The representation of heroes and villains in disease films serves as a reflection of changing societal perspectives over time. In earlier depictions, the government and institutions were typically the noble moral compasses, while modern portrayals have questioned their effectiveness and integrity. Characters associated with the government, like those from the CDC, are often portrayed with a degree of skepticism, sometimes even as antagonists, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. This shift highlights the increasingly critical lens through which society views authority figures, raising concerns about public trust and the moral implications of leadership during health crises.
The Impact of COVID-19 on Film Perception
The COVID-19 pandemic has reshaped people's engagement with disease-themed movies, creating a complex relationship between entertainment and reality. As viewers found parallels between real-life experiences and those depicted in films like 'Contagion' and 'Outbreak,' many revisited these narratives to gain insights or reassurance regarding the unfolding crisis. The rise in popularity of these films during the pandemic showcased how they became a lens for understanding personal fears and societal challenges, although they often failed to accurately reflect the nuanced and mundane aspects of living through a pandemic. This disconnect emphasizes the disparity between the dramatized cinematic experiences and the more commonplace reality of navigating life during health emergencies.
Cultural Narratives and Marginalized Groups
Disease films historically underrepresent marginalized communities, often overlooking the socio-economic and racial discrepancies that shape public health outcomes. Earlier films tended to exclude Black individuals and other minorities entirely, reflecting systemic racism and a narrow definition of American identity. As narratives evolved, films began to include more diverse characters but often failed to address the underlying societal issues they embody, portraying them as interchangeable within a dominant narrative devoid of specific cultural context. This lack of depth in character representation raises critical questions about how these films shape public understanding of disease and reinforce or challenge existing stereotypes in relation to marginalized communities during health crises.
Everyone’s got a favorite disease movie. What’s yours? Does it feature zombies like 28 Days Later (2002), or is it more grounded in reality, like Contagion (2011)? Does it end with a glimmer of hope or with a dose of despair? Who are the bad guys and who are the good guys? From the early days of disease movies like Panic in the Streets (1950) to more recent films like Little Joe (2019), these movies have provided endless entertainment, excitement, and opportunities to examine society itself. In this TPWKY book club episode, Robert Alpert, Dr. Merle Eisenberg, and Dr. Lee Mordechai join us to discuss their book Diseased Cinema: Plagues, Pandemics, and Zombies in American Movies. Diseased Cinema approaches the genre of disease-themed movies with the goal of understanding what these movies say about our hopes, our fears, our anxieties, and how these perspectives have shifted over the decades. When did faith in our government’s problem solving give way to rugged self-reliance? Why did people start to view science as the bad guy rather than the source of salvation? Tune in for a fascinating discussion that will stay on your mind long after your next movie night. And also check out Merle and Lee’s excellent podcast Infectious Historians!
Support this podcast by shopping our latest sponsor deals and promotions at this link: https://bit.ly/3WwtIAu