Rousseau's Critique of Free Speech

Rousseau argues that the Enlightenment thinkers who advocate for free speech and free debate are often intolerant and dogmatic in their approach. He suggests that reason, despite its significance, is insufficient to compel individuals to action and can even erode the moral fabric of society. This leads to questioning societal norms, customs, and beliefs that bind communities together. Rousseau highlights the paradox that while free expression is valued, it can also undermine community cohesion and lead to conflict.