The Supreme Court's ruling against the EPA in West Virginia v. EPA challenges agency authority in prioritizing cleaner energy under the Clean Power Plan, impacting future regulatory actions.
The Major Questions Doctrine invoked by the Supreme Court signifies increased scrutiny over agency interpretations, potentially expanding judicial power in administrative rule-making.
Deep dives
Supreme Court Challenges EPA's Clean Power Plan
The Supreme Court deliberated on West Virginia v EPA, contending the agency's authority to prioritize cleaner energy under the Clean Power Plan proposed by the Obama administration. Despite the policy being challenged by the energy lobby and abandoned by subsequent administrations, the court still ruled against the EPA.
Focus on Generation Shifting for Cleaner Energy
The Clean Power Plan aimed to reduce carbon emissions through 'generation shifting,' prioritizing greener energy sources like wind and solar over high-emission plants. This strategy involved states shifting energy production to cleaner sources within the energy grid, even though technicalities of the regulation weren't integral to the case's central argument.
Court's Position on EPA's Regulatory Authority
The key issue revolved around whether the EPA had the legal authority under the Clean Air Act to implement regulations like the Clean Power Plan, emphasizing greener energy. The Trump administration's challenge against the CPP asserted that regulating individual plants was within the EPA's scope, but generation shifting, an industry-wide approach, surpassed its statutory authority.
Major Questions Doctrine & Judicial Power
The Supreme Court's invocation of the Major Questions Doctrine signaled a shift in interpreting agency authority, focusing on significant economic and political issues. The doctrine allowed the Court to question agency interpretations of the law on major matters, implying stricter scrutiny and limited deference to agency decisions, impacting future regulatory actions and potentially expanding judicial power over administrative rule-making.
John Roberts has decided that the standard for whether or not something is a "major question" is whether or not it "raises an eyebrow." But like, let's not beat around the bush, John - you can just say vibe check.
Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.
If you're not a Patreon member, you're not hearing every episode! To get exclusive Patreon-only episodes, discounts on merch, access to our Slack community, and more, join at patreon.com/fivefourpod.